Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

04:56
Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
Published on: January 25, 2018
Evidence of commingling in human eating behavior
D B Allison1, S Heshka, B S Gorman
1Obesity Research Center, St. Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10025, USA.
Obesity Research
|September 1, 1993
Summary
Eating behavior distributions, including hunger and restraint, suggest a mixture of four distinct components, potentially indicating major gene effects influencing these traits.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral genetics
- Psychometrics
- Quantitative psychology
Background:
- Eating behavior is complex and may not follow a single distribution.
- Previous research suggests potential genetic influences on eating patterns.
- Understanding the underlying distributions can reveal population heterogeneity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if eating behavior measures (hunger, disinhibition, restraint) fit a mixture model.
- To investigate the possibility of major gene action underlying eating behaviors.
- To determine the number of component distributions for these traits.
Main Methods:
- Administered self-report measures of hunger, disinhibition, and dietary restraint to 901 undergraduates.
- Applied statistical methods including residualization, skewness transformation, and Hartigan's dip statistic.
- Utilized maximum likelihood estimation and likelihood ratio tests to compare mixture models.
Main Results:
- The distributions for hunger, disinhibition, and restraint were significantly non-unimodal.
- A mixture model comprising four component distributions provided a significantly better fit than simpler models.
- These findings support a complex, multi-component structure for eating behavior measures.
Conclusions:
- The data strongly suggest that eating behavior measures are composed of four underlying component distributions.
- This multi-component structure is consistent with the hypothesis of major gene effects influencing eating behavior.
- Future research should explore the genetic basis of these identified eating behavior components.
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
The Evidence for Evolution
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.The collection of fossils within sedimentary rocks give a record of common ancestry and often depicts the history of evolution.
Sources of Food Contamination
Contamination of food by microbial agents and natural toxins poses significant risks to public health. These hazards can be introduced at various points across the food supply chain, ranging from environmental sources to processing and storage stages. Understanding these contamination pathways is critical for developing strategies to ensure food safety.Seafood is particularly vulnerable to contamination through both environmental exposure and microbial colonization. Toxins from harmful algal...
Optimal Foraging
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Social Proof
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

