Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do abrupt-onset peripheral cues attract attention automatically?

M B Tepin1, V J Dark

  • 1Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011.

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|July 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conceptual activation of distractors during selection is not sufficient to produce negative priming.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2000
Same author

Flanker recall and the flanker validity effect may reflect different attentional processes.

Perception & psychophysics·1999
Same author

Perceptual implicit memory requires attentional encoding.

Memory & cognition·1999
Same author

Attentional processing of "unattended" flankers: evidence for a failure of selective attention.

Perception & psychophysics·1998
Same author

Semantic and spatial components of selective attention.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1996
Same author

Perceptual processing of pattern goodness by left and right hemispheres.

Brain and cognition·1993
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

Peripheral cues guide attention, but their effectiveness depends on expectation. Near cues consistently aid performance, while far cues benefit only when anticipated, suggesting a priming mechanism rather than attention capture.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Attention Research

Background:

  • Peripheral cues are used to predict target locations in visual tasks.
  • The role of cue location (near vs. far) and expectancy in visual attention is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the proportion and expectancy of peripheral cues influence visual discrimination performance.
  • To differentiate the mechanisms underlying cue-driven performance benefits (e.g., automatic priming vs. attentional capture).

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments manipulated the proportion of near and far peripheral cues predicting target location.
  • Expectancy for cue types was varied across experimental groups.
  • Target duration was manipulated in one experiment.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Near cues consistently provided a benefit regardless of expectancy.
  • Far cues produced benefits when expected, no effect when random, and costs when unexpected.
  • Reduced benefit for unexpected near cues was observed at longer stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs).

Conclusions:

  • Peripheral cues may operate through an automatic location priming mechanism, not necessarily attentional capture.
  • Expectancy critically modulates the allocation of attentional resources in response to peripheral cues.