Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A method for coping with overall productivity when making between-group category comparisons.

E E Wagner1, M K McCormick, R A Alexander

  • 1Dept. of Psychology, The University of Akron, OH 44325, USA.

Journal of Personality Assessment
|February 1, 1984
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mycorrhizal diversity in photosynthetic terrestrial orchids.

The New phytologist·2021
Same author

Hybridization of common reed in North America? The answer is blowing in the wind.

AoB PLANTS·2012
Same author

The attenuation of bluetongue virus by serial passage through fertile eggs.

The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary science and animal industry·2010
Same author

Studies on immunity in heartwater.

The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary science and animal industry·2010
Same author

Drenching adult ewes: implications of anthelmintic treatments pre- and post-lambing on the development of anthelmintic resistance.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2006
Same author

In vivo anthelmintic activity of Dorycnium rectum and grape seed extract against Ostertagia (Teladorsagia) circumcincta and Trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2006
Same journal

Comparing the Psychometric Characteristics of Two 32-Item Versions of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: An Extended Replication Study in English and Dutch.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Evaluation of a Contextualized Version of the German BFI-2 for the Digital World Across Self- and Other-Ratings.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Case Studies with the Rorschach Test: A Systematic Literature Review.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

A Stratified Analysis of Body Perception, Interoception and Somatosensory Brain Processing in Healthy Adults.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Predicting the Level of Suicide Risk with the MMPI-3.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and Strengths Use Scale (SUS): Revisiting Psychometric Properties and Gender Invariance in the General Spanish Population.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
See all related articles

This study presents a simple method to compare scoring categories between groups, addressing response productivity issues. Percentage comparisons using group data improve reliability over individual scores.

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Educational Measurement

Background:

  • Comparing scoring categories across groups can be affected by response productivity.
  • Reliability issues arise from percentage scores derived from single protocols.
  • Ratio and percentage scores present unique analytical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a straightforward method for comparing individual scoring categories between groups.
  • To address and mitigate the impact of response productivity on group comparisons.
  • To offer an alternative to potentially unreliable percentage scores from single protocols.

Main Methods:

  • A straightforward method is presented for comparative analysis.
  • The method utilizes group data for percentage comparisons.

Related Experiment Videos

  • An illustrative example is provided to demonstrate the application.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method effectively handles response productivity.
    • Percentage comparisons based on group data enhance score reliability.
    • The approach circumvents reliability issues linked to individual protocol scores.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented method offers a reliable approach for comparing scoring categories across groups.
    • Utilizing group data for percentage comparisons is a viable strategy to overcome reliability concerns.
    • This technique provides a more robust alternative for quantitative analysis in group studies.