Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On the Rorschach M response and monotheism.

C M DeCato1

  • 1Institute for Graduate Clinical Psychology, Widener University, Chester, PA 19013, USA.

Journal of Personality Assessment
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

The Rorschach human movement (M) response debate benefits from diverse perspectives, including perceptanalysis. Embracing varied approaches advances Rorschach psychology and personality assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The percept first, last, and always: the importance of microfacts in Rorschach analysis of the human movement response.

Journal of personality assessment·2001
Same author

Aggressiveness revisited: a comment on Frank's "on the prediction of aggressive behavior from the Rorschach".

Psychological reports·1994
Same author

Toward a training model for Rorschach scoring revisited: a follow-up study on a training system for interscorer agreement.

Perceptual and motor skills·1994
Same author

Piotrowski's enduring contributions to the Rorschach: a review of Perceptanalysis.

Journal of personality assessment·1993
Same author

Developmental level as a predictor of alcoholism treatment response: an attempted replication.

Addictive behaviors·1992
Same author

Developmental quality and developmental level in Rorschach scoring: a question of shared meaning.

Perceptual and motor skills·1992

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Personality Assessment

Background:

  • The Rorschach human movement (M) response is a subject of recent debate.
  • This debate has broader implications for Rorschach psychology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss perceptanalysis contributions to the Rorschach (M) response debate.
  • To argue that diversity in Rorschach approaches benefits the field's advancement.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of theoretical and clinical Rorschach psychology.
  • Interpretation of a clinical case example using perceptanalysis.
  • Analysis of Rorschach protocols.

Main Results:

  • Perceptanalysis offers valuable insights into the Rorschach (M) response debate.
  • Diversity in Rorschach interpretation methods is beneficial.
  • A single Rorschach approach is less advantageous than multiple perspectives.

Conclusions:

  • Diversification in Rorschach psychology and personality assessment is more beneficial than a singular approach.
  • Adopting a "monotheistic" Rorschach approach may hinder the field's progress.
  • Integrating diverse theoretical frameworks enhances Rorschach interpretation and assessment.

Related Experiment Videos