Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Patch Angioplasty in the Rat Aorta or Inferior Vena Cava
Published on: February 27, 2017
Amplatzer Vascular Plug to occlude the internal iliac arteries in patients undergoing aortoiliac aneurysm repair
1General Surgery Residency Program, Department of Surgery, Pinnacle Health Hospitals, Harrisburg, PA 17104, USA. ha_md@netzero.com
This study compares the use of a single nitinol-based plug device versus multiple metal coils for blocking blood flow in the internal iliac artery during aneurysm repair. The plug was found to be more cost-effective, easier to place precisely, and resulted in fewer complications compared to traditional coil methods.
Area of Science:
- Vascular surgery outcomes research within Amplatzer Vascular Plug clinical applications
- Interventional radiology and endovascular therapy
Background:
Aortoiliac aneurysm repair often requires blocking the internal iliac artery to prevent blood from leaking into the aneurysm sac. Surgeons traditionally rely on metal coils to achieve this vessel closure. This approach frequently necessitates multiple devices to ensure complete blockage. No prior work had resolved the high costs and procedural risks associated with using many coils. That uncertainty drove interest in alternative, single-device solutions for vascular occlusion. The Amplatzer Vascular Plug emerged as a potential candidate for this clinical requirement. This gap motivated a direct comparison between the newer plug technology and established coil techniques. Researchers sought to determine if the plug offered superior safety or financial benefits during endovascular procedures.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this report is to evaluate the clinical utility of the Amplatzer Vascular Plug for internal iliac artery occlusion. Researchers sought to compare this newer device against traditional coil embolization methods. The study addresses the challenge of preventing endoleaks during complex endograft repairs for aortoiliac aneurysms. Many surgeons face difficulties with the high costs and potential complications associated with using multiple metal coils. This investigation explores whether a single-device approach offers a more efficient alternative for vessel closure. The authors examine if precise placement of the plug can improve patient outcomes and reduce procedural risks. By analyzing data from two patient groups, the study assesses the financial and safety implications of these different embolization strategies. The motivation is to provide evidence-based guidance for optimizing vascular interventions in a hospital setting.
Main Methods:
The review approach involved a retrospective analysis of patients treated at a community hospital system. Investigators examined two distinct cohorts undergoing endograft repair between 2004 and 2005. The first group received the plug device, while the second group underwent conventional coil embolization. Medical records provided data on procedural success, device counts, and total costs. Clinicians performed angiographic verification to confirm the status of the internal iliac artery after intervention. Follow-up assessments tracked the resolution of post-procedural symptoms like buttock pain. Researchers compared the frequency of complications, such as device migration or ischemic events, across both treatment strategies. This systematic evaluation focused on identifying differences in efficiency and safety between the two embolization techniques.
Main Results:
The strongest finding indicates that the plug significantly reduces costs to 375 dollars per artery compared to 3,500 dollars for coils. Five patients treated with the plug achieved complete and precise occlusion using only one device each. In contrast, the coil group required an average of seven units per vessel, with a mode of five. Repeat embolization was necessary for three patients in the coil group due to incomplete initial results. Complications in the coil cohort included two instances of errant device migration into adjacent arteries. Buttock claudication occurred in two plug patients but resolved within eight weeks, whereas three coil patients experienced persistent symptoms. No instances of bowel ischemia or sexual dysfunction were observed in either group. One patient in the plug cohort developed a type II endoleak from the inferior mesenteric artery.
Conclusions:
The authors suggest the plug device provides a highly efficient alternative for internal iliac artery management. Synthesis and implications indicate that using one plug instead of many coils significantly lowers total procedural expenses. Precise placement at the vessel origin appears to reduce the risk of unintended device migration. The findings demonstrate that this single-device strategy effectively prevents blood flow without increasing ischemic complications. Clinical outcomes show that transient buttock pain resolves quickly in patients treated with the plug. The data support the adoption of this technology to streamline endograft preparation for complex aneurysms. This review of clinical experiences highlights the practical advantages of the plug over traditional coil embolization. Future applications may benefit from the simplified workflow and reduced material requirements identified in this report.
Frequently Asked Questions
The researchers propose that the plug achieves complete vessel closure using a single device, whereas coils require an average of seven units per artery. This difference in device count contributes to the observed cost reduction from 3,500 dollars for coils to 375 dollars for the plug.
The Amplatzer Vascular Plug is a self-expanding device constructed from nitinol. It is designed for precise placement at the origin of the vessel to ensure total occlusion, unlike coils which may migrate into the superficial femoral or common iliac arteries during deployment.
The authors note that precise deployment at the vessel origin is necessary to minimize the risk of ischemic complications. This accuracy prevents the need for repeat procedures, which were required in three patients treated with traditional coils.
Angiography serves as the primary data type to confirm the success of the occlusion. This imaging modality allows clinicians to verify that blood flow has completely ceased following the deployment of the device.
Buttock claudication is the primary measurement of ischemic complications. While two patients experienced mild, temporary pain after plug use, three patients in the coil group suffered from persistent symptoms, indicating a potential difference in recovery profiles between the two methods.
The researchers imply that the plug is a cost-effective method for managing the internal iliac artery. They suggest that minimizing the number of devices used helps avoid ischemic complications while simultaneously reducing the overall financial burden of the surgery.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Formation of the Platelet Plug
As the injured blood vessel contracts, endothelial cells undergo contraction, revealing collagen fibers in the basement membrane and underlying connective tissue. Furthermore, the plasma membrane of endothelial cells becomes adhesive, preparing the site for platelet adhesion. Platelets...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

