Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Development of a comprehensiveness of Rasch measurement application scale
1University of Manchester. iasonas.lamprianou@man.ac.uk
Abstract:
A large number of papers and technical reports are published every year describing researches where Rasch models are used. It has been observed, however, that not all the authors describe the application of the Rasch measurement with the same thoroughness. Some authors may leave behind important bits of information e.g. they may fail to investigate the person or item fit or may even fail to discuss the reliability of measurement. As a result, editorial guidelines have been published in order to suggest an informal minimum of thoroughness with which the authors may describe the application of Rasch measurement in their papers. This study presents stages for the development of a scale to investigate the comprehensiveness with which individual papers describe the application of Rasch models in practical settings. The scale is used to evaluate how comprehensively the papers published by the Journal of Applied Measurement present the application of Rasch models.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Ratio Level of Measurement
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated. For...
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks in the...
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...