Intestinal transplantation in children: differences between isolated intestinal and composite grafts

The results of the isolated intestinal grafts were compared with those of composite grafts (intestinal graft + liver) in a series of 18 transplantations performed in 17 children; 5 isolated intestinal grafts, 12 hepatointestinal grafts, and 1 multivisceral graft. Causes of intestinal failure were short bowel syndrome (n = 13), motility disorders (n = 2) and congenital epithelial disorders (n = 2). Transplantation was indicated due to end-stage liver disease (n = 14), loss of venous access (n = 2), untreatable diarrhea (n = 1) and high morbidity associated with a poor quality of life (n = 1). Six children, all with a composite graft, died after transplantation due to lymphoma (n = 2), sepsis (n = 1); intraabdominal bleeding (n = 1); pneumonia (n = 1); and overwhelming adenoviral infection (n = 1). Digestive autonomy was achieved in 16 of 18 grafts, the 11 surviving children are free of parenteral nutrition with a reasonably good quality of life. In conclusion, intestinal transplantation is a viable therapeutic alternative for children with permanent intestinal failure. The results of transplantation with an isolated intestine are clearly better that those with a composite graft.