Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026
Optocardiography and Electrophysiology Studies of Ex Vivo Langendorff-perfused Hearts
Published on: November 7, 2019
Quantification of subendocardial and subepicardial blood flow using 15O-labeled water and PET: experimental
Ornella Rimoldi1, Klaus P Schäfers, Ronald Boellaard
1Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom. ornella.rimoldi@csc.mrc.ac.uk
Unlabelled:
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of quantifying subendocardial and subepicardial myocardial blood flow (MBF) and the relative coronary flow reserves (CFR) using (15)O-labeled water (H(2)(15)O) and 3-dimensional-only PET.
Methods:
Eight pigs were scanned with H(2)(15)O and (15)O-labeled carbon monoxide (C(15)O) after partially occluding the circumflex (n = 3) or the left anterior descending (n = 5) coronary artery, both at rest and during hyperemia induced by intravenous dipyridamole. Radioactive microspheres were injected during each of the H(2)(15)O scans.
Results:
In a total of 256 paired measurements of MBF, ranging from 0.30 to 4.46 mL.g(-1).min(-1), microsphere and PET MBF were fairly well correlated. The mean difference between the 2 methods was -0.01 +/- 0.52 mL.g(-1).min(-1) with 95% of the differences lying between the limits of agreement of -1.02 and 1.01 mL.g(-1).min(-1). CFR was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in the ischemic subendocardium (PET = 1.12 +/- 0.45; microspheres = 1.09 +/- 0.50; P = 0.86) and subepicardium (PET = 1.2 +/- 0.35; microspheres = 1.32 +/- 0.5; P = 0.39) in comparison with remote subendocardium (PET = 1.7 +/- 0.62; microspheres = 1.64 +/- 0.61; P = 0.68) and subepicardium (PET = 1.79 +/- 0.73; microspheres = 2.19 +/- 0.86; P = 0.06).
Conclusion:
Dynamic measurements using H(2)(15)O and a 3-dimensional-only PET tomograph allow regional estimates of the transmural distribution of MBF over a wide flow range, although transmural flow differences were underestimated because of the partial-volume effect. PET subendocardial and subepicardial CFR were in good agreement with the microsphere values.