Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Conflict between guideline methodologic quality and recommendation validity: a potential problem for practitioners.

Joseph Watine1, Bruno Friedberg, Eva Nagy

  • 1Laboratoire de Biologie Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Général de Rodez, Rodez, France. j.watine@ch-rodez.fr

Clinical Chemistry
|January 5, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advanced machine learning-based screening for primary aldosteronism with plasma steroids, potassium, and renin.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

An improved approach to modelling patient reclassification: HbA<sub>1c</sub> as an example.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Progress in mast cell activation syndrome: the global consensus-2 diagnostic criteria at six years.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same author

Herpes simplex virus type 1 R-loops are targets for APOBEC-mediated mutagenesis.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

Truly elevated PTH or Ulysses syndrome?

Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports·2026
Same author

The Importance of Socioeconomic Factors Associated with Maternal Nutrition Knowledge and Undernutrition Among Children Under Five.

Nutrients·2025
Same journal

From Pooled Cohorts to PREVENT: A Perspective for Clinical Laboratorians.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Interlaboratory Comparison of a Glucagon and Oxyntomodulin Immuno-LC-MS/MS Assay: Implications for Diabetes Research.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Information-Dependent Acquisition and Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra for Untargeted Drug Testing on a Linear Ion Trap-Pulsing Quadrupole-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Patterns of One-Year Change in HbA1c and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Metrics in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

TSH Pediatric Reference Intervals: Lack of CALIPER Applicability to US-Based Populations.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Rapid Detection of Hemoglobinopathy Variants Using One-Step Library Preparation and Nanopore Sequencing.

Clinical chemistry·2026
See all related articles

Methodologic quality in practice guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) laboratory tests did not guarantee recommendation validity. Critical appraisal of guideline methods and recommendations is essential for clinical practice.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Pathology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Assessing the link between methodologic quality and recommendation validity in practice guidelines.
  • Focus on laboratory tests for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if high methodologic quality in practice guidelines leads to more valid recommendations.
  • Investigate the relationship between guideline development rigor and the trustworthiness of recommendations.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of laboratory test data for NSCLC (last 10 years).
  • Critical appraisal of 11 retrieved practice guidelines using AGREE criteria.
  • Scoring for methodologic quality and recommendation validity.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Guidelines exhibited significant shortcomings in methodologic quality.
  • Recommendation validity also showed limitations, though to a lesser extent.
  • No direct correlation found: high methodologic quality did not ensure valid recommendations, and vice versa.

Conclusions:

  • Urgent need for methodologic standards in guideline development for laboratory medicine.
  • International collaboration among guideline agencies is recommended.
  • Clinicians should critically evaluate both methods and recommendations before implementation.