Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
The use of double anonymity in peer review: a decision whose time has come?
1Analytical Science Group, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK.
Abstract:
The process of peer review for submissions to scientific journals is a well-established and widely used procedure. However, there may still be room for improvement in the procedural aspects of peer review. Advantages and disadvantages of the current system, against the introduction of systems using either no anonymity, or double anonymity, are assessed. Recommendations to improve the robustness and fairness of the peer review process are proffered for the reader's consideration.
More Related Videos
08:33A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
04:50Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
Published on: August 4, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Feedback Inhibition
Blind Procedures
Ethics in Research
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Deindividuation
Blinding