Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peer Review as a QA Tool in Environmental Applications.

George M Brilis1, John G Lyon

  • 1U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.

Quality Assurance (San Diego, Calif.)
|January 6, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Peer review can enhance scientific quality assessment throughout a project, not just at the end. This method offers a cost-effective way to ensure research integrity and data quality.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Jupiter's unusual magnetospheric topology structures its aurora.

Science advances·2021
Same author

Space weather. Ionospheric control of magnetotail reconnection.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2014
Same authorSame journal

Implementing and auditing electronic recordkeeping systems used in scientific research and development.

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2005
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Scientific methodology
  • Research integrity
  • Quality assessment

Background:

  • Peer review is traditionally a final project stage validation.
  • Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) are most effective throughout project lifecycles.
  • Referenced data comparison is the gold standard for validation but is often cost-prohibitive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose peer review as an integrated quality assessment tool.
  • To extend the application of peer review beyond the final project stage.
  • To offer a cost-effective quality assessment alternative.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes a framework for integrating peer review into project planning.
  • It suggests applying peer review during the process stage of a project.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It advocates for peer review during the product review phase.

    • Main Results:

    • Implementing peer review throughout project stages enhances overall quality assessment.
    • This approach provides a practical and cost-effective alternative to traditional validation methods.
    • Peer review, when applied early and often, improves research soundness and data quality.

    Conclusions:

    • Peer review can be effectively utilized as a proactive quality assessment tool.
    • Integrating peer review throughout planning, process, and review strengthens scientific validity.
    • This expanded role for peer review addresses limitations of traditional QA/QC and validation methods.