Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Types of clinical studies. III. Cross-sectional studies
1Centro de Estudos de Medicina Baseada na Evidência, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Portugal. avc@fm.ul.pt
Abstract:
Cross-sectional studies are a common methodology to investigate etiological factors and interactions and hierarchization of interventions. They start with a defined population, sample or cohort of patients and simultaneously evaluate the results, their presumed predictive factors and subject characteristics; these studies are also known as prevalence studies, since they enable calculation of disease frequency in a particular sample. This type of study can be used to determine the discriminatory power of a diagnostic test, the predictive characteristics of a clinical finding, or the prevalence of a disease or etiology of an illness. The measure of association in cross-sectional studies is prevalence, the ratio between the diseased subjects at one point in time and all subjects at risk at that point in time. In this article we will present the methodological design and the advantages and disadvantages of cross-sectional studies.
Related Concept Videos
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Cross-Sectional Research
Longitudinal Studies
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.