Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Focusing strength and a subjective method for determining refraction].

N M Sergienko, R L Timoshchuk

    Vestnik Oftalmologii
    |January 13, 2006
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Aberrometry of a new artificial implanted lenses model with changeable refractive surface].

    Likars'ka sprava·2014
    Same author

    [Aberrometry results of a new IOL model with variable refractive surface].

    Vestnik oftalmologii·2014
    Same author

    Capsule fixation device for cataract surgery.

    European journal of ophthalmology·2009
    Same author

    Depth of focus: clinical manifestation.

    European journal of ophthalmology·2007
    Same author

    Accommodative function of eyes in persons exposed to ionizing radiation.

    Ophthalmic research·2002
    Same author

    [Micro-trephination of the limbus in neovascular glaucoma].

    Vestnik oftalmologii·2001
    Same journal

    [Impairment of retinal and choroidal blood flow autoregulation in preeclampsia].

    Vestnik oftalmologii·2026
    Same journal

    [Non-glaucomatous optic nerve atrophy: epidemiology, etiological structure, and clinical diagnostic features].

    Vestnik oftalmologii·2026
    Same journal

    [Microbiota and microbiome of the lacrimal drainage system].

    Vestnik oftalmologii·2026
    Same journal

    [Differential assessment of diagnostic signs of primary open-angle glaucoma and high myopia].

    Vestnik oftalmologii·2026
    Same journal

    [Applied anatomy of the optic nerve].

    Vestnik oftalmologii·2026
    Same journal

    [Epidemiology and diagnostic methods of microbial keratitis].

    Vestnik oftalmologii·2026
    See all related articles

    Subjective refractometry results were re-evaluated considering natural eye focusing strength. This correction significantly shifted refractive error distributions, revealing a higher prevalence of emmetropia in clinical practice.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Vision Science

    Background:

    • Subjective refractometry is a standard method for determining refractive error.
    • The classical method assumes a schematic eye with no inherent focusing strength.
    • Recent data suggest the human eye typically possesses focusing strength exceeding 0.5 diopters, potentially impacting refractometry accuracy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To re-evaluate clinical refraction distributions by incorporating the eye's natural focusing strength into subjective refractometry.
    • To assess the impact of correcting for inherent ocular focusing power on refractive error classification.

    Main Methods:

    • A subjective refractometry method using trial lenses was employed on 374 eyes under natural accommodation.
    • Refraction data were analyzed with and without considering the eye's inherent focusing strength (using +0.25 D or +0.5 D lenses).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Visual acuity was maintained at 1.0 or higher, indicating vision retention through focusing strength rather than solely accommodation.

    • Main Results:

    • Initial subjective refraction revealed: hypermetropia (43.6%), emmetropia (30.8%), myopia (12.8%), and astigmatism (12.8%).
    • After accounting for the eye's focusing strength, the distribution shifted significantly: emmetropia (73.0%), myopia (12.8%), astigmatism (12.8%), and hypermetropia (1.4%).
    • The correction demonstrated that eyes with good visual acuity maintain vision by utilizing inherent focusing strength.

    Conclusions:

    • The typical assumption of a non-focusing schematic eye in subjective refractometry may lead to inaccurate refractive error classification.
    • Incorporating the eye's natural focusing strength provides a more accurate representation of refractive error distributions in the population.
    • This adjusted method highlights a higher prevalence of emmetropia than previously reported by classical subjective methods.