Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A general formulation for a one-sided group sequential design.

Barry K Moser1, Stephen L George

  • 1Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 2717, Durham, NC 27710, USA. moser004@mc.duke.edu

Clinical Trials (London, England)
|January 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of treatment effect heterogeneity for multiregional randomized clinical trials.

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2025
Same author

Futility monitoring for randomized clinical trials with non-proportional hazards: An optimal conditional power approach.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2023
Same author

Commentary on Harun et al.: The use of historical controls in randomized clinical trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2023
Same author

A Signature Enrichment Design with Bayesian Adaptive Randomization.

Journal of applied statistics·2021
Same author

Design and analysis of biomarker-integrated clinical trials with adaptive threshold detection and flexible patient enrichment.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2020
Same author

Bias-adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves for marginal treatment effect in observational studies.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2019
Same journal

A statistical evaluation of decision-making methods and the efficiency of Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Accounting for non-adherence: A re-analysis of the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results trial.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Phase I design for partially ordered groups with late-onset toxicity.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Trial informed consent forms, the Declaration of Helsinki and the SPIRIT 2025 statement.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Morning panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Afternoon panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

This study develops group sequential designs using conditional probabilities, offering a new method to evaluate early stopping rules in clinical trials. These designs align with existing methods and enhance stochastic curtailment procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Group sequential designs are crucial for efficient clinical trials.
  • Pampallona and Tsiatis developed closed-form functions for popular group sequential designs.
  • Conditional probabilities are used in stochastic curtailment for interim decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Develop group sequential designs utilizing conditional probabilities.
  • Compare these new designs with the Pampallona and Tsiatis closed-form family.
  • Relate the developed designs to existing stochastic curtailment procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical formulation and derivation of the problem and solution.
  • Development of one-sided group sequential design boundary points from conditional probability statements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Graphical interpretation to aid understanding of results and their significance.

    • Main Results:

    • Derived boundary points are closed-form functions based on conditional probabilities.
    • These boundary points are identical to Pampallona and Tsiatis's under mild constraints.
    • Recommended increasing conditional probability levels in stochastic curtailment to at least 0.50 for more likely early stopping.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed methods are applicable to one-sided group sequential designs.
    • Conditional probabilities offer a valuable framework for creating group sequential designs.
    • Conditional probabilities are useful for evaluating stochastic curtailment procedures.