Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.

Michael D Dodd1, Erin D Sheard, Colin M MacLeod

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. michaeld@psych.utoronto.ca

Memory (Hove, England)
|January 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cognitive predictors of metacognitive accuracy.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2026
Same author

Preparing to produce (without production) is sufficient to elicit a behavioral and pupillometric production effect.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Attentional processing in a modified multiple object-tracking paradigm.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

The pupillometric production effect: Evidence for enhanced processing preceding, during, and following production.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Overestimation of variability in ensembles of color value and size.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

How varying cue duration influences item-method directed forgetting: A novel selective retrieval interpretation.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same journal

Episodic and semantic memory contributions to imagination and creativity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: a metacognitive perspective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Beliefs about child witnesses: a survey of Danish legal professionals, social workers and psychologists.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Potto-biographical memory ≈ autobiographical memory: on the retrieval and organisation of fictional- and personal-event memories.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Conceptual and perceptual chunking of real-world objects in visual working memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
See all related articles

Re-exposure to studied items during a test does not increase false recognition in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. This suggests retrieval processes do not impact false memories in this memory task.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Memory Research

Background:

  • The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is widely used to study false recognition.
  • Understanding factors influencing false recognition is crucial for memory research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if re-exposure to studied items at test affects false recognition in the DRM paradigm.
  • To examine if exposure to critical lures influences memory for subsequent study items.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using the DRM paradigm.
  • Participants underwent recognition tests with varying numbers of studied items preceding the critical lure.
  • Experiment 2 replicated findings under speeded test conditions.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Neither false recognition of critical lures nor accurate memory for studied items was affected by the manipulation of item re-exposure.
  • Results were consistent across both experiments, including under speeded conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Re-exposure to previously studied items during a recognition test does not influence true or false recognition in the DRM paradigm.
  • Findings suggest that retrieval processes do not play a role in generating false recognition within the DRM paradigm.