Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

3.0- Versus 1.5-T MR cholangiography: a pilot study.

E M Merkle1, P A Haugan, J Thomas

  • 1Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke North, Rm. 1417, Erwin Rd., Durham, NC 27710, USA. elmar.merkle@duke.edu

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|January 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Magnetic resonance cholangiography at 3.0 T provides superior image quality compared to 1.5 T. This higher field strength improves contrast-to-noise ratios and confidence in detecting intrahepatic biliary variants.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Portrayal of radiology in a major medical television series: How does it influence the perception of radiology among patients and radiology professionals?

European radiology·2015
Same author

ESGAR consensus statement on liver MR imaging and clinical use of liver-specific contrast agents.

European radiology·2015
Same author

Computed high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging improves lesion contrast and conspicuity in prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2015
Same author

[Rational imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. The challenge of multimodal diagnostic criteria].

Der Radiologe·2014
Same author

Contrast-enhanced free-breathing 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence for hepatobiliary MRI in patients with breath-holding difficulties.

European radiology·2013
Same author

Case report. Spontaneous cholecystocolic fistula and locoregional liver tumour ablation: a cautionary tale.

The British journal of radiology·2011

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background:

  • Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) is crucial for non-invasive biliary system imaging.
  • Field strength impacts MRC image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare quantitative and qualitative image quality of MRC at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T.

Main Methods:

  • 15 healthy volunteers underwent MRC at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T using standardized protocols.
  • Image quality was assessed by comparing contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and through qualitative analysis by three reviewers.
  • Specific sequences included HASTE and 3D turbo spin-echo (TSE).

Main Results:

  • 3.0 T demonstrated significantly higher CNR between bile ducts and surrounding tissue across all measured locations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The 3D TSE sequence provided the best CNR and qualitative scores at both field strengths.
  • Intrahepatic biliary variants were detected with greater confidence at 3.0 T (p < 0.01).

    • Conclusions:

    • 3.0 T MRC offers enhanced CNR compared to 1.5 T MRC.
    • Higher field strength improves confidence in visualizing intrahepatic biliary anatomy and variants.