Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Characteristics of an "ill-defined" diagnosis for stroke: opportunities for improvement
Henraya F McGruder1, Janet B Croft, Zhi-Jie Zheng
1Cardiovascular Health Branch, Division of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. hdd8@cdc.gov
Insights
A significant number of stroke hospitalizations receive an "ill-defined" diagnosis, particularly among women, Black, and Hispanic patients. This highlights disparities in stroke evaluation and diagnosis, necessitating improved hospital protocols.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Accurate stroke subtype diagnosis is critical for effective treatment and patient outcomes.
- This study investigates factors influencing the likelihood of an
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess factors associated with receiving an
Main Methods:
- Analysis of Medicare hospital claims for stroke diagnoses in individuals aged 65 years and older from 2000.
- Categorization of stroke subtypes using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes.
Main Results:
- Out of 445,452 stroke claims, 20.9% were classified as ill-defined.
- Women, Black, and Hispanic patients had higher odds of an ill-defined stroke diagnosis compared to men and White patients, respectively.
- Geographic disparities were observed, with 14 states reporting >=25% of all stroke diagnoses as ill-defined.
Conclusions:
- A substantial proportion of stroke cases are discharged with an ill-defined diagnosis, indicating a need for enhanced early stroke response and evaluation.
- Racial, gender, and geographic disparities in stroke diagnosis require further investigation.
- Improving hospital stroke policies, reimbursement practices, and public health initiatives are essential for better disease reporting and clinical outcomes.
Background And Purpose:
Rapid and accurate evaluation of stroke subtypes is crucial for optimal treatment and outcomes. This study assessed factors associated with the likelihood of an "ill-defined" diagnosis for stroke hospitalizations.
Methods:
We examined all hospital claims for stroke among Medicare beneficiaries aged > or =65 years in 2000. Stroke subtypes included hemorrhagic (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 430 to 432), ischemic (433 to 434), ill-defined (436 to 437), and late effects of cerebrovascular disease (438).
Results:
Among 445 452 hospital claims for stroke, 65.3% were ischemic, 20.9% were ill defined, 11.9% were hemorrhagic, and 1.9% were late effects of cerebrovascular disease. After controlling for age, women (odds ratio [OR],1.30; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.32), blacks (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.33), and Hispanics (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.34) were more likely to receive a discharge diagnosis of ill defined compared with men and whites, respectively. Differences in age, sex, emergency room presentation, and evidence of diagnostic procedures accounted for some but not all racial disparities. In 14 states, ill-defined strokes constituted > or =25% of all stroke diagnoses.
Conclusions:
The high proportion of stroke patients who receive an ill-defined diagnosis on discharge suggests a continued need for improvements in early response and prompt evaluation of strokes. Findings of geographic, gender, and racial disparities in ill-defined stroke diagnosis warrant further investigation. Reimbursement practices and public health efforts that promote hospital stroke policies are critical to improve disease reporting as well as clinical outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Hemorrhagic Stroke l: Introduction
Stroke: Introduction and Types
Hemorrhagic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction