Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

SmartClip versus conventional twin brackets for initial alignment: is there a difference?

Peter G Miles1

  • 1pmiles@beautifulsmiles.com.au pmiles@beautifulsmiles.com.au

Australian Orthodontic Journal
|January 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does microetching enamel reduce bracket failure when indirect bonding mandibular posterior teeth?

Australian orthodontic journal·2008
Same author

Self-ligating brackets: present and future.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2007
Same author

Self-ligating vs conventional twin brackets during en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2007
Same author

Orthodontic retention and stability: a clinical perspective.

Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO·2007
Same author

Electrosurgery: an alternative to laser surgery in orthodontics.

Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO·2007
Same author

A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment.

The Angle orthodontist·2006
Same journal

Orthodontic considerations for impacted and ectopic teeth.

Australian orthodontic journal·2018
Same journal

Management of missing mandibular second premolars: a review.

Australian orthodontic journal·2018
Same journal

3D facial and dento-alveolar imaging.

Australian orthodontic journal·2018
Same journal

What is the truth behind the smile?

Australian orthodontic journal·2018
Same journal

Brackets, epitopes and flash memory cards: a futuristic view of clinical orthodontics.

Australian orthodontic journal·2018
Same journal

The history of dental hygienists in Australia and their use in orthodontic practice.

Australian orthodontic journal·2018
See all related articles

SmartClip brackets were not more effective than conventional twin brackets for initial lower arch alignment. Conventional brackets showed slightly better irregularity reduction at 10 weeks, but no significant difference was found after 20 weeks.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Dental Materials Science

Background:

  • Initial alignment is crucial for orthodontic treatment success.
  • Self-ligating brackets, such as SmartClip, are designed to potentially improve efficiency over conventional twin brackets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of SmartClip brackets versus conventional twin brackets in the initial alignment of the lower arch.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective trial involving 58 patients randomly assigned to SmartClip or conventional MBT twin brackets.
  • Lower anterior irregularity was measured at baseline, 10 weeks, and 20 weeks.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in initial irregularity between groups.
  • Conventional brackets showed a statistically significant lower irregularity index at 10 weeks (0.7 mm difference).

Related Experiment Videos

  • No statistically significant differences in irregularity were observed between the groups at 20 weeks.
  • Conclusions:

    • SmartClip brackets did not demonstrate superior effectiveness in reducing lower arch irregularity compared to conventional twin brackets.
    • The ligation method (elastomeric modules or stainless steel ligatures) for conventional brackets did not alter the comparative effectiveness.