Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How intellectual is chess? -- a reply to Howard.

Merim Bilalic1, Peter McLeod

  • 1University of Oxford, UK.

Journal of Biosocial Science
|January 31, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Chess performance differences between genders are not due to innate ability. Research shows top male and female chess players have similar intellectual abilities, suggesting practice and interest are key factors.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Low-dimensional and optimised representations of high-level information in the expert brain.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Grit subcomponents are differentially associated with practice trajectories underlying expertise development.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Planning, Cognitive Reflection, Inter-Temporal Choice, and Risky Choice in Chess Players: An Expertise Approach.

Journal of Intelligence·2025
Same author

Computers and chess masters: The role of AI in transforming elite human performance.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2024
Same author

Never Too Much-More talent in football (always) leads to more success.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Gritting One's way to success - Grit explains skill in elite youth soccer players beyond (deliberate) practice.

Psychology of sport and exercise·2023

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Sports Science

Background:

  • Examines the premise linking male dominance in chess to innate ability differences, as proposed by evolutionary psychology.
  • Challenges the assumption that high-level chess skill relies on superior intelligence (IQ) and visuospatial abilities.

Discussion:

  • Presents empirical evidence refuting the IQ and visuospatial ability premise, citing research from 1927 onwards.
  • Highlights that world-class chess players, regardless of gender, do not exhibit exceptional intellectual capacities.

Key Insights:

  • Gender disparities in chess achievement are unlikely to stem from inherent cognitive differences.
  • Alternative explanations, such as varying participation rates, practice, motivation, and interest, are more plausible.

Outlook:

  • Suggests future research should focus on sociocultural and environmental factors influencing chess engagement and performance.
  • Recommends exploring how to foster greater female participation and interest in chess to address gender gaps.

Related Experiment Videos