Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function.

Brian P Keane1, Zenon W Pylyshyn

  • 1Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, USA. keane@ucla.edu

Cognitive Psychology
|January 31, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrast sensitivity and subjective visual disturbances across the psychosis continuum.

Cognitive neuropsychiatry·2026
Same author

Increased face perception in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: mechanisms, sex differences, and clinical correlates.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Distributed network flows generate localized category selectivity in human visual cortex.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same author

Functional dysconnectivity of visual and somatomotor networks yields a simple and robust biomarker for psychosis.

Molecular psychiatry·2024
Same author

Correcting visual acuity beyond 20/20 improves contour element detection and integration: A cautionary tale for studies of special populations.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Hallucinations and the depth-inversion illusion in schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia research·2024
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

Visual tracking of multiple objects does not rely on prediction. Performance is better when objects reappear at their disappearance location, regardless of trajectory predictability or occlusion.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Multiple object tracking (MOT) is a fundamental cognitive function.
  • The role of predictive mechanisms in MOT, especially during object reappearance, remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether visual tracking mechanisms utilize prediction when recovering multiple reappearing objects.
  • To determine factors influencing tracking performance during object disappearance and reappearance.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted involving the abrupt disappearance and reappearance of multiple objects mid-trajectory.
  • Varied parameters included reappearance location (locus of disappearance vs. extrapolated trajectory), disappearance duration, displacement magnitude, and path predictability.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Occlusion cues were manipulated in some conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Tracking performance was superior when objects reappeared at their locus of disappearance compared to extrapolated trajectories.
    • Performance deteriorated monotonically with increased displacement magnitude during disappearance.
    • Tracking was not dependent on whether objects moved in predictable paths, even when reappearing backward.
    • Occlusion cues did not enhance predictive tracking.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings suggest that multiple object tracking mechanisms may not rely on prediction for object recovery.
    • Reappearance at the original location appears to be a critical cue for successful tracking.
    • The results challenge predictive models of MOT and highlight the importance of spatial memory.