Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: May 27, 2022
Subgroup analyses in therapeutic cardiovascular clinical trials: are most of them misleading?
Adrián V Hernández1, Eric Boersma, Gordon D Murray
1Center for Clinical Decision Sciences, Department of Public Health, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.hernandez@erasmusmc.nl
Insights
Subgroup analyses in cardiovascular trials often lack proper prespecification and statistical testing. Improved reporting is crucial to prevent misleading treatment decisions based on secondary findings.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) guide cardiovascular treatment decisions.
- Subgroup analysis interpretation in these trials requires scrutiny.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the appropriateness of subgroup analysis use and interpretation in cardiovascular RCTs.
- To identify shortcomings in reporting practices.
Main Methods:
- Reviewed 63 phase 3 cardiovascular RCTs (≥100 patients) from major journals (2002, 2004).
- Evaluated subgroup analysis reporting: prespecification, number, interaction tests, significance, and emphasis.
- Analyzed reporting differences by sample size, trial outcome, and CONSORT adherence.
Main Results:
- 39/63 RCTs reported subgroup analyses; 26 had >5 subgroups.
- No RCT was powered for subgroup effects; only 14 had fully prespecified subgroups.
- 11 RCTs used interaction tests; 21 claimed significant subgroups, 15 emphasized them over overall results.
Conclusions:
- Cardiovascular RCT subgroup analyses frequently lack prespecification and appropriate statistical testing.
- Emphasis on subgroup findings without proper methodology can mislead clinical treatment decisions.
- Substantial improvements in reporting subgroup analyses are necessary.
Background:
Treatment decisions in clinical cardiology are directed by results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We studied the appropriateness of the use and interpretation of subgroup analysis in current therapeutic cardiovascular RCTs.
Methods:
We reviewed main reports of phase 3 cardiovascular RCTs with at least 100 patients, published in 2002 and 2004, and from major journals (Circulation, J Am Coll Cardiol, Am Heart J, Am J Cardiol, N Engl J Med, Lancet, JAMA, BMJ, Ann Intern Med). Information on subgroups included prespecification, number, interaction test use, significant subgroups found, and emphasis on findings. We examined appropriateness of reporting and differences according to sample size, overall trial result, and CONSORT adoption.
Results:
We selected 63 RCTs, with a median of 496 (range 100-15,245) patients. Thirty-nine RCTs were reported with subgroup analyses and 26 with > 5 subgroups. No trial was specifically powered to detect subgroup effects, and only 14 RCTs were reported with fully prespecified subgroups. Only 11 RCTs were reported with interaction tests. Furthermore, 21 RCTs were reported with claims of significant subgroups and 15 with equal or more emphasis to subgroups than to the overall results. Subgroup analyses in large RCTs (> 500 patients) were reported more often than in small ones (24/30 vs 15/33, P = .005). No differences were found according to overall result (positive/negative) or CONSORT adoption.
Conclusions:
Subgroup analyses in recent cardiovascular RCTs were reported with several shortcomings, including a lack of prespecification and testing of a large number of subgroups without the use of the statistically appropriate test for interaction. Reporting of subgroup analysis needs to be substantially improved because emphasis on these secondary results may mislead treatment decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification