Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

12:45
Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Prospective comparison of echocardiographic atrioventricular delay optimization methods for cardiac resynchronization
Jeffrey E Kerlan1, Navinder S Sawhney, Alan D Waggoner
1Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. jkerlan@im.wustl.edu
Heart Rhythm
|January 31, 2006
Summary
Optimizing atrioventricular (AV) delay with the aortic velocity time integral (VTI) method improves cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response more than the mitral inflow method in heart failure patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Atrioventricular (AV) delay optimization is crucial for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) effectiveness in heart failure patients with conduction delays.
- Medically refractory heart failure impacts patient response to CRT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of two Doppler echocardiographic methods for optimizing AV delay in patients undergoing CRT.
- Evaluate which AV delay optimization technique yields superior outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography was used in 40 severe heart failure patients (NYHA class 3.1 +/- 0.4, QRS 177 +/- 23 ms, LVEF 26% +/- 6%).
- Compared stroke volume improvement using two AV delay optimization methods: aortic velocity time integral (VTI) and mitral inflow timing.
- Aortic VTI method identified AV delay maximizing aortic VTI; mitral inflow method optimized mitral valve closure timing.
Main Results:
- The aortic VTI method increased aortic VTI by 19% +/- 13%, significantly more than the mitral inflow method's 12% +/- 12% (P <.001).
- Optimized AV delay was longer with the aortic VTI method (119 +/- 34 ms) compared to the mitral inflow method (95 +/- 24 ms) (P <.001).
- No correlation was found between AV delays determined by the two methods (r = 0.03).
Conclusions:
- AV delay optimization using the aortic VTI method via Doppler echocardiography provides greater systolic improvement in CRT patients with severe heart failure.
- The aortic VTI method is a more effective strategy for AV delay optimization compared to the mitral inflow method in this population.
