Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimum detectable activity when background is counted longer than the sample.

D J Strom1, P S Stansbury

  • 1Health Physics Department, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352.

Health Physics
|September 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

THE MAYAK WORKER DOSIMETRY SYSTEM (MWDS-2013) FOR INTERNALLY DEPOSITED PLUTONIUM: AN OVERVIEW.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2020
Same author

THE MAYAK WORKER DOSIMETRY SYSTEM (MWDS-2013) FOR INTERNALLY DEPOSITED PLUTONIUM: AN OVERVIEW.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2020
Same author

Elevated radioxenon detected remotely following the Fukushima nuclear accident.

Journal of environmental radioactivity·2011
Same author

Toward the framework and implementation for clearance of materials from regulated facilities.

Health physics·2005
Same author

Eliminating bias in routine bioassay when there is an unknown time of intake.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2003
Same author

Dosimetry, dosinference and doswaggery.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2002
Same journal

Assessment of Health Risks of Adults and Children Due to Consumption of Uranium in Groundwater from Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radiation Protection Abstracts, Volume 46, Number 1.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Specialized Radiological Assets for Navigable Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

DoseBusters: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Radiation Protection and Detection.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radioactivity in Bottled Drinking Water from Greater Dhaka City and Concomitant Ingestion Doses to Consumers.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

Health physics·2026
See all related articles

Accurate measurement of minimum detectable activity (MDA) requires careful consideration of background counting times. Extending background counting duration significantly improves measurement precision by reducing uncertainties and MDA values.

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear physics
  • Analytical chemistry
  • Radiation detection

Background:

  • Accurate determination of minimum detectable activity (MDA) is crucial in radiation detection.
  • Standard protocols often assume equal counting times for samples and background.
  • Deviations in counting times can introduce significant errors in MDA calculations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide the correct formula for calculating MDA when background and sample counting times differ.
  • To elucidate the impact of varying background counting durations on measurement accuracy.
  • To highlight the benefits of extended background counting in radiation measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of the MDA formula accounting for different background (tb) and gross (tg) counting times.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Mathematical analysis of the formula to assess the effect of tb and tg on MDA.
  • Discussion of the relationship between background count rate (Rb), counting efficiency (epsilon), and MDA.

    • Main Results:

    • The derived MDA formula is: MDA = [3 + 3.29 * sqrt(Rb*tg*(1 + tg/tb))]/epsilon*tg.
    • Increasing the background counting time (tb) relative to the gross counting time (tg) demonstrably reduces MDA.
    • Extended background counting minimizes decision levels and uncertainties, provided random count rate fluctuations are the sole source of variability.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented formula accurately corrects MDA calculations for differing sample and background counting times.
    • Longer background counting periods are recommended to enhance measurement sensitivity and reduce MDA.
    • The benefits of extended background counting are maximized when measurement uncertainties are dominated by counting statistics.