Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stimulus factors affecting illusory rebound motion.

P-J Hsieh1, P U Tse

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Moore Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Po-Jang.Hsieh@dartmouth.edu

Vision Research
|February 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First- and second-order transformational apparent motion rely on common shape representations.

Vision research·2021
Same author

Spatial pattern of BOLD fMRI activation reveals cross-modal information in auditory cortex.

Journal of neurophysiology·2012
Same author

Pre-stimulus pattern of activity in the fusiform face area predicts face percepts during binocular rivalry.

Neuropsychologia·2011
Same author

Motion fading is driven by perceived, not actual angular velocity.

Vision research·2010
Same author

Recognition alters the spatial pattern of FMRI activation in early retinotopic cortex.

Journal of neurophysiology·2010
Same author

Microsaccade directions do not predict directionality of illusory brightness changes of overlapping transparent surfaces.

Vision research·2009
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Illusory rebound motion (IRM) is a visual illusion where colors appear to move back and forth. This study shows IRM can occur without clear motion cues and its direction can be unstable.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Motion perception
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Illusory rebound motion (IRM) is a recently reported visual illusion.
  • IRM involves the perception of motion where colors appear to traverse a stimulus, like a zipper closing and opening.
  • The stimulus involves a bar alternating between two colors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate stimulus attributes influencing illusory rebound motion (IRM).
  • To determine if IRM can be perceived without first-order motion-energy.
  • To explore factors affecting the perceived direction and frequency of IRM.

Main Methods:

  • Testing IRM using dynamic squares or disks with random dot or checkerboard textures.
  • Analyzing the perception of IRM in the absence or ambiguity of first-order motion-energy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigating the multistable nature of IRM direction and factors influencing perceived frequency.

    • Main Results:

    • IRM can be perceived even when first-order motion-energy is absent or ambiguous.
    • The perceived direction of IRM is multistable, capable of spontaneous or volitional changes.
    • Stimulus contours, texture, and motion-energy influence the perceived frequency of IRM.

    Conclusions:

    • IRM perception is not solely dependent on first-order motion-energy.
    • The dynamic and subjective nature of IRM direction is confirmed.
    • Multiple stimulus features modulate the temporal characteristics of IRM, offering insights into motion perception mechanisms.