Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Patient dosimetry approaches in interventional cardiology and literature dose data review
1Medical Physics Institute, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy. padovani.renato@aoud.sanita.fvg.it
Insights
Interventional radiology procedures can lead to high radiation doses due to long fluoroscopy times. Dosimetric evaluations are crucial for assessing risks, ensuring quality, and preventing radiation effects in patients undergoing these procedures.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiology
- Radiation Protection
Background:
- Interventional radiology (IR) procedures are a significant source of collective radiation dose to the population.
- High radiation doses in IR are often associated with complex or repeated procedures requiring prolonged fluoroscopy and high image quality.
- Increasingly, dosimetric evaluations are becoming essential in IR to manage radiation exposure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and categorize patient dosimetry methods used in interventional radiology.
- To highlight the importance of dosimetric evaluations for risk assessment and radiation protection in IR.
- To describe dosimetric practices and data specific to interventional cardiology.
Main Methods:
- Categorization of patient dosimetry methods based on their purpose: stochastic risk evaluation, quality assurance, and prevention of deterministic effects.
- Review of dosimetric methods employed in interventional cardiology.
- Compilation of relevant published dosimetric data from interventional cardiology practices.
Main Results:
- Patient dosimetry in IR can be broadly classified into three main categories based on objective.
- Specific dosimetric methods and data are available for interventional cardiology, a common IR subspecialty.
- The findings underscore the need for standardized and accurate dosimetry in IR.
Conclusions:
- Dosimetric evaluations are critical for managing radiation exposure in interventional radiology.
- Understanding and applying appropriate dosimetry methods are essential for patient safety and radiation protection.
- Further research and data collection in interventional cardiology dosimetry will aid in optimizing patient care and safety.
Abstract:
Interventional radiology contributes a significant proportion of the collective dose of the population from medical exposures. Interventional radiology procedures are usually fluoroscopy-guided diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. When complex procedures are performed or procedures are repeated for the same patient, high-radiation dose levels can occur because procedures often require long fluoroscopy times and require high-quality images. For all of these reasons, dosimetric evaluations in interventional radiology are widely increasing. Patient dosimetry methods currently used in interventional radiology may be divided into three categories according to dosimetry purpose: (I) dosimetry for stochastic risk evaluation, (II) dosimetry for quality assurance and (III) dosimetry to prevent the deterministic effects of radiation. A short description of dosimetric methods used in interventional cardiology practice and relevant published dosimetric data are reported.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

