Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The causal asymmetry.

Peter A White1

  • 1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom. whitepa@cardiff.ac.uk

Psychological Review
|February 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans exhibit a causal asymmetry bias, overestimating the cause and underestimating the effect in physical interactions. This fundamental bias influences our perception of how events unfold and is observed across various cognitive domains.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Postdictive processing in perception.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Global trends in norovirus genotype distribution among medically attended children with acute gastroenteritis, 2020-2025.

Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology·2026
Same author

Three propositions about conscious experience and their implications for theories of consciousness.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

Transcriptome mining reveals diversity and evolution of circulating and endogenous amphibian retroviruses.

Retrovirology·2025
Same author

Molecular epidemiology and evolution of norovirus in Australia and New Zealand, 2018 to 2020.

Infectious diseases (London, England)·2025
Same author

Norovirus-mediated translation repression promotes macrophage cell death.

PLoS pathogens·2024
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Human understanding of physical causation is fundamental to navigating the world.
  • Previous research suggests potential biases in how individuals perceive cause-and-effect relationships.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate a hypothesized fundamental bias in human understanding of physical causation, termed causal asymmetry.
  • To review existing evidence for this bias across different domains of reasoning and perception.

Main Methods:

  • Review of evidence from studies on visual perception of causality.
  • Analysis of naive physics problem-solving related to Newton's third law.
  • Examination of linguistic expressions of causality.
  • Evaluation of causal judgment research using contingency information.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Consistent evidence suggests humans overestimate the causal object's role and underestimate the effect object's role.
  • This causal asymmetry bias is observed in visual impressions, naive physics, language, and contingency judgments.
  • The existence of a similar bias in social causality remains uncertain due to insufficient evidence.

Conclusions:

  • A pervasive causal asymmetry bias exists in human understanding of physical causation.
  • This bias systematically distorts the perceived importance of causes versus effects.
  • Further research is needed to confirm the presence of causal asymmetry in social contexts.