Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect
Asher Koriat1, Hilit Ma'ayan, Ravit Nussinson
1Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel. akoriat@research.haifa.ac.il
Abstract:
Do we run away because we are frightened, or are we frightened because we run away? The authors address this issue with respect to the relation between metacognitive monitoring and metacognitive control. When self-regulation is goal driven, monitoring effects control processes so that increased processing effort should enhance feelings of competence and feelings of knowing. In contrast, when self-regulation is data driven, such feelings may be based themselves on the feedback from control processes, in which case they should decrease with increasing effort. Evidence for both monitoring-based control and control-based monitoring occurring even in the same situation is presented. The results are discussed with regard to the issue of the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Metacognition
Cognition and Behavior
Self-Awareness and Its Effects
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Cause and Effect
