Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Overview of biologics.

J Tracy Watson1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110-0250, USA. watsonjt@slu.edu

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
|February 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Incidence of Nonindicated and Inadequate Ankle Stress Views.

Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances·2026
Same author

Bone Transport Techniques-Classic (Ilizarov + Hexapod With Pins and Wires).

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2025
Same author

Fragment-specific fixation of simple and complex tibial plateau fractures using mini fragment plates.

Injury·2025
Same author

Assessing the impact of perioperative anticoagulant continuation on DVT/PE rates in trauma patients.

Injury·2025
Same author

The induced membrane technique for bone defects: Basic science, clinical evidence, and technical tips.

OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma·2023
Same author

Management of aseptic nonunions and severe bone defects: let us get this thing healed!

OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma·2023
Same journal

An analysis of risk factors for failure after operative treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 18-60 years of age.

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2026
Same journal

Uncorrected Preoperative Malnutrition Is Associated with Worse Outcomes After Operative Fixation of Diaphyseal Tibial Fractures.

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2026
Same journal

Functional Outcomes Following Bipolar Hip Hemiarthroplasty via the Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior and Direct Lateral Approaches: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2026
Same journal

Preoperative High-Sensitivity Troponin and Risk of In-Hospital Mortality and Cardiac Events after Hip Fracture Surgery.

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2026
Same journal

A Comprehensive Guide to Tibial Nailing Systems for Short Segment Nailing Procedures.

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive Screw Fixation of Olecranon Fractures.

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2026
See all related articles

Orthobiologic materials enhance bone fracture repair, with options like autografts, allografts, and bone morphogenic proteins. This review covers available bone grafting materials and their varied clinical outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Bone fracture repair is a significant clinical challenge.
  • Orthobiologic materials offer promising solutions for enhancing bone healing.
  • Current options range from traditional grafts to advanced biologics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review currently available bone grafting materials.
  • To provide an overview of their composition and mechanisms.
  • To briefly discuss their clinical results.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of orthobiologic materials for bone repair.
  • Categorization of materials based on type and origin.
  • Summary of mechanisms of action and clinical outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Autografts and allografts are established bone grafting options.
  • Conductive substrates, demineralized bone matrix, and platelet gels represent diverse approaches.
  • Recombinant bone morphogenic proteins and bone marrow aspirate injections offer biologic augmentation.

Conclusions:

  • A wide array of orthobiologic materials exist for bone fracture repair.
  • These materials differ significantly in their properties and efficacy.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for selecting appropriate treatments.