Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
A short history of the General Medical Council
1Picker Institute, Oxford, UK.
Insights
The General Medical Council (GMC) has evolved from a reactive regulator to a proactive body ensuring doctors meet professional standards. This transformation aims to guarantee patients receive high-quality care through effective regulation and revalidation.
Area of Science:
- Medical Regulation
- Professional Standards
- Doctor Accountability
Background:
- The General Medical Council (GMC) historically regulated British doctors, facing challenges balancing profession, public, and governmental interests.
- Early GMC functions focused on complaint management, leading to public distrust due to perceived inaction and protectionism.
Observation:
- Public impatience and the Bristol Royal Infirmary crisis spurred significant reforms in the GMC's approach.
- The GMC introduced 'Good Medical Practice,' establishing professional standards collaboratively with the public and profession.
Findings:
- New professionalism emphasizes public involvement and defines clear standards for all doctors.
- Regular revalidation, including relicensure, is planned to evaluate and maintain doctors' practice standards.
Implications:
- Effective implementation of professional regulation is crucial for upholding patient entitlement to good medical care.
- The GMC's ongoing evolution aims to enhance doctor accountability and ensure consistent quality in healthcare delivery.
Introduction:
The General Medical Council (GMC) regulates British doctors through the Medical Act. The Council comprises doctors (who predominate) and laypeople. It registers doctors for UK practice, sets professional standards, regulates basic medical education, and manages doctors' fitness to practise. The GMC sits uneasily at the interface between the medical profession, the public, Parliament and the National Health Service. Herein lie the seeds of inertia and conflict.
A Traditional Regulator:
The early GMC mainly managed serious complaints against doctors. Reactive, passive and distant from doctors, it was reconstituted in 1979 after it lost their confidence. At this point the public became increasingly impatient with the GMC because it appeared to be too protective of doctors and unwilling to tackle poor practice. When it did respond, its actions were perceived as too little, too late. Public pressure accelerated radical change following the 1990s crisis in paediatric cardiac surgery at Bristol Royal Infirmary.
New Professionalism:
In the 1990s, the GMC itself set a new direction. There was more public involvement. A statement of professional standards -Good Medical Practice- was agreed between profession and public. The standards are tied to licensure, medical education and workplace clinical governance, and are to be observed by all doctors. The biggest change is the plan to evaluate doctors' practice regularly through revalidation in the form of relicensure.
Conclusion:
All patients are entitled to a good doctor. The challenge to the profession and the GMC is to ensure they fulfil this entitlement by implementing professional regulation effectively.
Related Concept Videos
History of Microbiology
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Purpose of Health Records II
Good Manufacturing Practices
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Introduction to Documentation and Reporting
Nursing documentation records essential information and details regarding a patient's care and treatment in written or electronic form. It is a critical aspect of nursing practice that involves documenting assessments, interventions, outcomes, and other relevant details about a patient's health status.
Documentation maps the patient's health journey by creating a comprehensive and precise...