Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The hand that rocks the cradle.

K C Sheehan1

  • 1Southwestern University School of Law, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

University of Toledo Law Review. University of Toledo. College of Law
|February 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A completely foreign receptor can mediate an interferon-gamma-like response.

The EMBO journal·2001
Same author

Signaling through TNF receptor p55 in TNF-alpha-deficient mice alters the CXCL13/CCL19/CCL21 ratio in the spleen and induces maturation and migration of anergic B cells into the B cell follicle.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2001
Same author

Baculovirus stimulates antiviral effects in mammalian cells.

Journal of virology·1999
Same author

Disruption of the Jak1 gene demonstrates obligatory and nonredundant roles of the Jaks in cytokine-induced biologic responses.

Cell·1998
Same author

Ligand-induced formation of p55 and p75 tumor necrosis factor receptor heterocomplexes on intact cells.

The Journal of biological chemistry·1997
Same author

Constitutive shedding of both p55 and p75 murine TNF receptors in vivo.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·1997
Same journal

Regulating life and death: the modification and commodification of nature.

University of Toledo law review. University of Toledo. College of Law·2006
Same journal

The hand as emblem of human identity: a solution to the abortion controversy based on science and reason.

University of Toledo law review. University of Toledo. College of Law·2006
Same journal

Regulating advanced reproductive technologies: a comparative analysis of Jewish and American law.

University of Toledo law review. University of Toledo. College of Law·2003
Same journal

Shaken baby syndrome: a comparative study: Anglo-American law and Jewish law--legal, moral, and ethical issues.

University of Toledo law review. University of Toledo. College of Law·2003
Same journal

Human cloning: the role of law.

University of Toledo law review. University of Toledo. College of Law·2003
Same journal

The image of God, the eggs of women, and therapeutic cloning.

University of Toledo law review. University of Toledo. College of Law·2003
See all related articles

This essay critiques the eight-week reproductive choice limit, arguing it unfairly burdens women and undervalues human life. It proposes supporting mothers instead of drawing arbitrary lines on fetal development.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Reproductive Rights
  • Constitutional Law

Background:

  • Critiques Donald Hope's proposal to limit reproductive choice at eight weeks of pregnancy.
  • Hope's argument is based on the developing embryo's lack of human form before eight weeks and unique human characteristics after.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the ethical and constitutional implications of Hope's eight-week proposal.
  • To argue against drawing a definitive line for reproductive rights based on fetal development stages.
  • To propose an alternative framework for state involvement in reproductive decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical and ethical analysis of reproductive rights.
  • Legal interpretation of constitutional rights related to pregnancy.
Keywords:
Genetics and ReproductionLegal ApproachRoe v. Wade

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critique of biological markers for moral status.
  • Main Results:

    • The eight-week proposal is deemed both too early (imposing coerced motherhood) and too late (valuing life by physical features).
    • The proposed line fails to adequately address the moral integrity of women or the complex nature of human life.
    • An alternative approach is suggested where the state supports mothers.

    Conclusions:

    • No specific gestational line should determine reproductive rights.
    • State interest in developing life can be met by supporting mothers.
    • Reproductive choice and support for motherhood are not mutually exclusive.