Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Topology-induced coarsening in language games
Andrea Baronchelli1, Luca Dall'Asta, Alain Barrat
1Dipartimento di Fisica, Università La Sapienza and SMC-INFM, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy.
In semiotic dynamics models, agents in low-dimensional lattices reach consensus via coarsening, requiring less cognitive effort but taking longer than mean-field models. This study analyzes convergence mechanisms and scaling behaviors in large populations.
Area of Science:
- Complex Systems
- Computational Social Science
- Statistical Physics
Background:
- Investigating emergent global consensus from local interaction rules is crucial for understanding collective behavior.
- Semiotic dynamics, particularly the naming game model, provides a framework for studying how agents establish shared conventions.
- Understanding the impact of spatial structure on consensus formation is key to bridging microscopic rules and macroscopic outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare consensus convergence mechanisms in the naming game model between low-dimensional lattices and mean-field approximations.
- To analyze the cognitive effort, memory requirements, and time scales associated with consensus formation in different spatial dimensions.
- To provide analytical and numerical evidence for the scaling behavior of convergence in various dimensions.
Main Methods:
- Agent-based modeling of the naming game on low-dimensional lattices (d <= 4) and comparison with mean-field analysis.
- Mapping the one-dimensional boundary dynamics to a truncated Markov process for analytical computation of the diffusion coefficient.
- Analytical derivation and numerical simulation of memory and time scaling for consensus convergence as a function of population size (N) and dimension (d).
Main Results:
- Low-dimensional lattices facilitate consensus through a coarsening process, demanding less cognitive effort per agent compared to mean-field.
- Consensus formation takes longer in low dimensions, with convergence time scaling as N^(1+2/d) up to the upper critical dimension (d=4).
- In contrast, mean-field models exhibit memory and time scaling of N^(3/2).
Conclusions:
- Spatial structure significantly influences the efficiency and dynamics of consensus formation in large populations.
- The trade-off between cognitive effort and convergence time highlights the importance of dimensionality in collective learning and agreement.
- The findings offer insights into the emergence of shared meaning and coordination in decentralized systems.
Related Concept Videos
Language and Cognition
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Components of Language
Language
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus: Problem Solving