Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Delayed response to animate implied motion in human motion processing areas.

Jeannette A M Lorteije1, J Leon Kenemans, Tjeerd Jellema

  • 1Helmholtz Research Institute, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|February 24, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A collaborative guide to Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT): Methods, insights, and recommendations.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Deep learning for freezing of gait assessment using inertial measurement units: a multicentre validation study.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

Skin Conductance Dynamics Across Freezing of Gait, Voluntary Stopping, and Walking in Parkinson's Disease: Effects of Medication State in Semi-Free-Living Environments.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Neural Correlates for Anticipating and Observing Goal-Directed Actions in Autism.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2026
Same author

Independent Markers of Attentional Shifts.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Does Preoperative Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Impact the Results After Aortic Root Surgery? Decision-Making Between Aortic Valve-Sparing Techniques and Bentall Operation.

Heart, lung & circulation·2026

Static images with implied motion activate the medial temporal complex (MT+) more than static images without motion. This suggests feedback from object recognition areas to MT+ after visual processing.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The human medial temporal complex (MT+) is traditionally associated with motion perception.
  • fMRI studies show heightened MT+ activation when viewing static images with implied motion compared to static images without.
  • This suggests a potential feedback mechanism from object recognition areas to MT+.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hypothesis of feedback projections from object recognition areas to MT+.
  • To explore the neural processing of implied motion in visual stimuli.
  • To differentiate the neural responses to implied motion versus real motion.

Main Methods:

  • Recording extracranial potentials evoked by static photographs of biological agents.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing brain responses to images with and without implied motion.
  • Utilizing source analysis to identify the origin of evoked potentials.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant difference in evoked potentials was observed between 260 and 400 msec for implied motion.
    • Source analysis identified a bilateral dipole pair in the occipital lobe for implied motion.
    • Real motion elicited a response approximately 100 msec earlier than implied motion.

    Conclusions:

    • The delayed response to implied motion supports feedback projections onto MT+ after object recognition.
    • Visual perception of implied motion involves higher-level temporal processing before engaging MT+.
    • Findings challenge the traditional view of MT+ solely for motion perception, highlighting its role in integrating form and motion information.