Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response preparation and code overlap in dual tasks.

Iring Koch1, Wolfgang Prinz

  • 1Max Planck Institutefor Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Department of Psychology, Munich, Germany. iring.koch@cbs.mpg.de

Memory & Cognition
|February 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting cognitive control in the Simon and spatial Stroop tasks regarding their interference with the control of standing balance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Exploring age-related inhibitory deficits in auditory attention: Evidence from attention switching.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Visual-manual response selection produces dual-task interference in auditory-verbal memory encoding.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Opposite effects of interruption frequency on performance in interrupted and uninterrupted multistep task.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Huh, what did they say again? The influence of task interruption position and workload on auditory-verbal memory performance.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Visual encoding and response preparation interfere when performed together, especially at short intervals. This suggests shared cognitive resources between visual processing and motor response initiation.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human factors
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Dual-task performance reveals cognitive resource limitations.
  • Understanding cross-task interference is crucial for optimizing complex task design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interference between visual encoding and manual response preparation.
  • To examine the role of temporal intervals and spatial compatibility in dual-task performance.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a visual-encoding task concurrently with a speeded manual response task.
  • Key manipulations included stimulus-response cue intervals, target-go signal intervals, and spatial cross-task compatibility.
  • Two experiments were conducted, with one manipulating compatibility effects through instruction.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Visual encoding interfered with response preparation and initiation, particularly at short target-go intervals.
  • A cross-task compatibility effect was observed, with faster responses in compatible trials.
  • Compatibility effects were reversed by instruction, suggesting a basis in response-response overlap.
  • Response preparation negatively impacted visual task accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Response preparation and visual encoding share common cognitive codes and processes.
  • Interference occurs due to overlapping resources in response preparation and visual encoding.
  • The findings have implications for understanding cognitive load and task interactions.