Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Authors and publication practices.

Michael J G Farthing1

  • 1St George's, University of London, London, SW17 0RE, United Kingdom. m.farthing@sgul.ac.uk

Science and Engineering Ethics
|February 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Research misconduct can involve anyone, including editors and reviewers, not just authors. Increased transparency and ethical standards are crucial for maintaining integrity in scientific publishing and industry-sponsored trials.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

30 years of UEG: What has been achieved and what does the future hold?

United European gastroenterology journal·2022
Same author

Nicholas Culpeper (1616-1654): London's first general practitioner?

Journal of medical biography·2014
Same author

Research misconduct: a grand global challenge for the 21st Century.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2013
Same author

Gastro 2013 APDW/WCOG Shanghai working party report: chronic diarrhea: definition, classification, diagnosis.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2013
Same author

Expert review of the evidence base for prevention of travelers' diarrhea.

Journal of travel medicine·2009
Same author

Expert review of the evidence base for self-therapy of travelers' diarrhea.

Journal of travel medicine·2009

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Scientific Publishing
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • Authors are typically viewed as the primary individuals responsible for research and publication misconduct.
  • However, ethical breaches can originate from any participant in the scientific process, including editors and reviewers.
  • Existing ethical guidelines for authors regarding conflicts of interest need to be extended to editors and reviewers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the potential for misconduct by editors and reviewers.
  • To advocate for greater transparency in the relationships between journal editors, owners, and the biomedical industry.
  • To discuss necessary reforms in scientific publishing, particularly concerning industry-sponsored clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of ethical standards in scientific publishing.
  • Review of current practices regarding conflicts of interest for authors, editors, and reviewers.
  • Discussion of proposed reforms for transparency and ethical conduct.

Main Results:

  • Editors and reviewers, like authors, can engage in misconduct and must disclose conflicts of interest.
  • Transparency is urgently needed regarding the relationships between journal editors and owners.
  • A significant overhaul is required in the relationship between journals, editors, and the biomedical industry.

Conclusions:

  • Ethical misconduct in research and publishing is a multifaceted issue involving authors, editors, and reviewers.
  • Implementing transparent practices and robust conflict of interest disclosures is essential for maintaining scientific integrity.
  • Reforming the dynamics between journals, the biomedical industry, and clinical trial reporting is critical for trustworthy scientific communication.

Related Experiment Videos