Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding combat casualty care statistics.

John B Holcomb1, Lynn G Stansbury, Howard R Champion

  • 1US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234, USA. John.Holcomb@amedd.army.mil

The Journal of Trauma
|March 2, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the effectiveness of simvastatin in slowing the progression of disability in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a synopsis of MS-STAT2, a multicentre, randomised controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

The clinical, radiological and genetic spectrum AARS2-related leukoencephalopathy: a case series of 15 patients and review of the literature.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

An automated quantitative report for multiple sclerosis using only 3D T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI.

Neuroradiology·2026
Same author

From Uncertainty to Pathogenicity: Resolving a CSF1R Variant of Uncertain Significance Using Long-Read Transcriptomics.

Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society·2026
Same author

Prion disease: An unlikely MS mimic.

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)·2025
Same author

The ABILHAND-23 Patient Reported Outcome Measure in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis With the Nine Hole Peg Test.

Brain and behavior·2025
Same journal

Article.

The Journal of trauma·2014
Same journal

Article.

The Journal of trauma·2014
Same journal

Program schedule for the sixty-fifth annual meeting of the american association for the surgery of trauma.

The Journal of trauma·2014
Same journal

Letters to the editor.

The Journal of trauma·2014
Same journal

Posttraumatic brachial plexitis.

The Journal of trauma·2011
Same journal

Incidental findings in focused assessment with sonography for trauma in hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients: speaking about cost to benefit.

The Journal of trauma·2011
See all related articles

Standardized battlefield injury definitions and equations improve analysis of combat casualty care effectiveness. Consistent metrics enable better research and resource allocation for military medicine.

Area of Science:

  • Military Medicine
  • Trauma Surgery
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Effective military medical record-keeping is crucial for refining treatment strategies during conflicts.
  • Converting raw battlefield data into actionable insights requires standardized terminology and consistent equations.
  • Previous analyses lacked uniform definitions, hindering comparisons across different conflicts and treatment phases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish clear terminology and equations for analyzing combat casualty care effectiveness.
  • To provide consistent metrics for evaluating pre- and post-medical treatment facility care.
  • To facilitate meaningful comparisons of battlefield lethality and care efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Defined three key terms: case fatality rate (CFR), killed in action (KIA), and died of wounds (DOW).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developed equations for these metrics using consistent numerators and denominators.
  • Applied these definitions and equations to historical data (WWII, Vietnam) and current data from the Joint Theater Trauma Registry (JTTR).

    • Main Results:

    • Established a standardized framework for assessing combat casualty outcomes.
    • Enabled consistent application of metrics across diverse military conflicts.
    • Facilitated the analysis of battlefield lethality and the effectiveness of combat casualty care.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized definitions and equations are essential for accurate analysis of military medical data.
    • Consistent application of these metrics to the JTTR will enhance understanding of combat casualty care.
    • This framework supports future research and optimizes resource allocation in military medicine.