Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy
Published on: November 28, 2025
Imaging osteoarthritis: magnetic resonance imaging versus x-ray
Charles Peterfy1, Manish Kothari
1Scientific Client Services, Synarc San Francisco, 575 Market Street, 17th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.
Abstract:
Until recently, imaging evaluation of osteoarthritis has relied primarily on conventional radiography. Using radiography in clinical practice or clinical research, however, has been fraught with difficulty. Techniques for reproducibly acquiring serial radiographs of joints have improved considerably over the past several years. However, the greatest promise for advancing knowledge about osteoarthritis and its treatment lies in MRI and its unique ability to examine the joint as a whole organ. In contrast to conventional radiography, MRI can directly visualize the articular cartilage, synovium, menisci, and other intra-articular structures important to the functional integrity of joints. There have been considerable advances in MRI of articular cartilage in particular over the past several years. However, much of this has come from small cross-sectional studies. Larger, longitudinal studies are ongoing, and publications are just emerging. This paper reviews the current status of x-ray and MRI in osteoarthritis and points to where changes might be anticipated in the future.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
X-ray Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called a...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
