Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
The role of similarity in deductive categorical inference
Dustin P Calvillo1, Russell Revlin
1Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. calvillo@psych.ucsb.edu
Abstract:
The category inclusion rule specifies that categories inherit the properties of their superordinates. For example, given that all metals are pentavalent, it can be concluded that all iron is pentavalent. Sloman (1998) showed that people do not fully endorse conclusions that follow from the category inclusion rule. He claims that people rely on the similarity between the premise and the conclusion categories (metals and iron), rather than applying the category inclusion rule. By allowing reasoners to rate their certainty for category relations (e.g., iron is metal), as well as for conclusions, the present study shows that similarity has only an indirect effect on the certainty of conclusions: Reasoners are more certain that similar categories have a category inclusion relation, and this in turn affects the certainty of conclusions based on this relation.
Related Concept Videos
Deductive Reasoning
Inductive Reasoning
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Reasoning
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
The Representativeness Heuristic

