Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Principal component analysis of lifting waveforms.

Allan T Wrigley1, Wayne J Albert, Kevin J Deluzio

  • 1Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, NB, Canada E3B 5A3. allan.wrigley@unb.ca

Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
|March 10, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of markerless motion capture for static postural control assessment.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same author

Agonist-antagonist muscular co-contraction improves rapid corrective responses.

iScience·2025
Same author

Sensorimotor adaptation to sustained lower visual field occlusion during continuous locomotion with and without obstacle negotiation.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same author

Self-perceived middle-distance race pace is faster in advanced footwear technology spikes.

Journal of sport and health science·2024
Same author

Active workstations: A literature review on workplace sitting.

Journal of bodywork and movement therapies·2024
Same author

Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2024
Same journal

Non-invasive measurement of lumbar mobility using a flexible curve ruler in patients with total hip arthroplasty.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical study of Tibial plateau fractures using 3D printing and digital design: A finite element analysis.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical effects of Kinesio versus Mulligan ankle taping on balance and ankle function in chronic STROKE: A randomized controlled trial.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Interlimb differences in knee joint loading and stress distribution following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during stair descent.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Exploring real-world lumbar posture behaviour. A whole day comparison of individuals with low back pain and healthy controls.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Motor differences in jumping among children with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
See all related articles

Principal component analysis effectively distinguished lifting differences between populations, even with varying loads. This method helps analyze kinetic waveforms, separating load effects from biomechanical changes.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Kinetic analysis
  • Data analysis techniques

Background:

  • Analyzing kinetic lifting waveforms is challenging due to confounding factors like body mass, height, and load.
  • Existing methods struggle to differentiate true biomechanical changes from load-induced variations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the sensitivity of principal component analysis (PCA) for quantifying clinically relevant differences in kinetic lifting waveforms.
  • To analyze lifting waveforms across three load magnitudes and between two distinct populations.

Main Methods:

  • Applied principal component analysis (PCA) to five kinetic lifting waveforms.
  • Used derived principal component scores as dependent measures in a two-way (clinical status x load magnitude) MANOVA.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant differences (P<0.05) were found between low back pain groups for sacral/thoracic extension moments and trunk compression.
  • All variables showed significant differences across three load conditions.
  • Four significant differences indicated mechanical changes due to increasing load magnitudes.

Conclusions:

  • PCA proved insensitive to load magnitude as a confounder when identifying clinically relevant waveform differences.
  • PCA successfully partitioned variability due to external load versus variations in lifting mechanics.
  • This technique offers potential benefits for kinetic analyses with other confounding factors like body size.