Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Responsibility for global health.

Allen Buchanan1, Matthew DeCamp

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
|March 15, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Community perspectives on the return of research results and ownership of data and specimens for brain tumor genomic research.

SSM. Qualitative research in health·2026
Same author

Correction: Does Bioethics Pay Sufficient Attention to Issues Related to Chronic Disease? A Survey of Articles Published in Top Bioethics Journals from 2001 to 2024.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same author

"Black box" artificial intelligence for mortality prediction: a mixed-methods study of palliative care team, patient, and caregiver perspectives.

Annals of palliative medicine·2026
Same author

Does Bioethics Pay Sufficient Attention to Issues Related to Chronic Disease? A Survey of Articles Published in Top Bioethics Journals from 2001 to 2024.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same author

Ethical, legal, and social issues related to ingestible, implantable electronic devices and mRNA delivery devices.

Device·2025
Same author

Dashboard Intervention for Tracking Digital Social Media Activity in the Clinical Care of Individuals With Mood and Anxiety Disorders: Randomized Trial.

JMIR mental health·2025
Same journal

The mechanics of epistemic justice: a response to Toding et al. and their application of my epistemic approach to dignity.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Flourishing within vulnerability: on human fragility and the conditions for a habitable environment.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Camouflaging in autism as a dual-normative construct: a philosophical critique.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

The last low whispers revisited: a reply to Sulmasy on palliative sedation.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Epistemic justice and the moral status of the dead.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Practical wisdom in medicine: defending a multidimensional, integrated view of an indispensable virtue.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
See all related articles

Global health challenges require international cooperation due to their worldwide scope. This study clarifies state responsibilities and advocates for institutional changes to ensure equitable global health outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Global Health
  • Ethics
  • International Relations

Background:

  • Increasing recognition of transnational health risks necessitates global cooperation.
  • Human rights and cosmopolitan ethics provide a moral framework for global health initiatives.
  • Existing commitments to global health lack specific, actionable obligations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To translate broad commitments to global health improvement into defined obligations.
  • To analyze the scope and nature of state responsibilities in global health.
  • To identify needs for institutional innovation in global health governance.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of global health obligations.
  • Examination of state responsibilities in the context of international cooperation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual framework development for institutional reform in global health.

    • Main Results:

    • State responsibilities for global health are more extensive and specific than commonly understood.
    • Current institutional structures are insufficient for fair distribution of responsibilities.
    • Accountability mechanisms for state and non-state actors in global health are lacking.

    Conclusions:

    • A clearer understanding of state obligations is crucial for advancing global health.
    • Significant institutional innovation is required to manage global health responsibilities effectively.
    • Enhanced accountability frameworks are necessary for equitable global health outcomes.