Non-initiation and discontinuation of resuscitation

Whereas certain aspects of neonatal resuscitation may benefit from evidence evaluation using standard evaluation techniques, the ethical aspects of non-initiation and discontinuation of resuscitative efforts are more subjective and might certainly be influenced by the biases of the reviewers. The outcome data are relatively straightforward, although survival and morbidity data differ significantly by region and even among hospitals classified at similar levels in the same region. However, the interpretation of that data is necessarily somewhat subjective. Whereas certain aspects of neonatal resuscitation may benefit from evidence evaluation using standard evaluation techniques, the ethical aspects of non-initiation and discontinuation of resuscitative efforts are more subjective and might certainly be influenced by the biases of the reviewers. The outcome data are relatively straightforward, although survival and morbidity data differ significantly by region and even among hospitals classified at similar levels in the same region. However, the interpretation of that data is necessarily somewhat subjective. Does a survival rate of 1% of patients at a certain weight or gestational age warrant full resuscitative efforts? What about 20% or 49%? Similar questions could be posed regarding significant morbidity. However, as the science of neonatal resuscitation advances, it is important to review objective evidence-based outcome data in certain situations in which non-initiation or discontinuation of resuscitative efforts may be appropriate to determine if certain common themes can be elicited.