Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

13:02
The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics
Published on: October 5, 2016
Ergonomic evaluation of winegrape trellis systems pruning operation
A E Kato1, F A Fathallah, J A Miles
1Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
|March 16, 2006
Summary
Winegrape pruning causes musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This study found the VSP trellis system best reduces wrist and lower back injury risk during pruning, aiding vineyard selection for worker health.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Engineering
- Occupational Health
- Ergonomics
Background:
- The winegrape industry faces high rates of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).
- Vineyard pruning is physically demanding, repetitive work contributing to MSDs.
- Trellis systems influence worker posture and injury risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively assess five winegrape trellis systems for MSD risk.
- To evaluate risks to the wrist and lower back during pruning tasks.
- To identify trellis systems that minimize occupational health hazards.
Main Methods:
- Eleven subjects performed simulated pruning tasks.
- Electrogoniometers measured wrist and trunk postures.
- Postural data was analyzed to compare MSD risk across trellis systems.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in worker posture were observed among the five trellis systems.
- The VSP (Vertical Shoot Positioning) trellis system showed the lowest relative MSD risk.
- Postural analysis indicated VSP as optimal for reducing wrist and lower back strain.
Conclusions:
- Trellis system selection significantly impacts worker musculoskeletal health in vineyards.
- The VSP system is recommended for its potential to decrease MSD risk during pruning.
- Integrating worker health into trellis system choice can improve vineyard safety and productivity.
Related Concept Videos
Method of Joints: Problem Solving II
Consider a truss structure with frictionless joints fixed to a wall and roller support. If a force of 150 N is applied to joint A, the forces in each member of the truss can be determined using the method of joints.
Method of Sections: Problem Solving II
Consider an arbitrary truss structure composed of diagonal, vertical, and horizontal members fixed to the wall. To calculate the force acting on members CB, GB, and GH, method of sections can be used. The loads and lengths of the horizontal and vertical members are known parameters, as shown in the figure.
Frames: Problem Solving I
Consider a jib crane with an external load suspended from the pulley. The dimensions of the crane members are shown in the figure. A systematic analysis of the frame structure is required to determine the reaction forces at the pin joints, assuming that the pulleys are frictionless.
Applications of Stress
Consider a structure made of a boom and a rod designed to support a load. These two components are connected by a pin and stabilized by brackets and pins. The boom and the rod are detached from their supports to assess the different stresses imposed on this structure, and a free-body diagram is drawn. Then, all the forces applied, including the load acting on the structure, are identified. The reaction forces exerted on both the boom and the rod are computed using the equilibrium equations.
The...
The...

