Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis.

Agnes Moors1, Jan De Houwer

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. agnes.moors@ugent.be

Psychological Bulletin
|March 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anxiety, Cognitive Biases, and Evaluative Conditioning: An Eye-Tracking Experiment.

International review of social psychology·2026
Same author

A goal-directed perspective on dampening of positive affect.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Assessing the Relational Abilities of Large Language Models and Large Reasoning Models.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

The HEXACO Adjective Scale: A Cross-Cultural Validity Study.

Journal of personality assessment·2025
Same author

Re-examining Spontaneous Trait Transference from an Attributional Perspective.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025
Same author

Long-term Contingency Learning Depends on Contingency Awareness.

Journal of cognition·2025
Same journal

Artificial intelligence as a partner in meta-analysis-Research agenda, user recommendations, and speed-accuracy tradeoffs: Commentary on Jansen et al. (2025).

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Relationships between cognition and daily functioning in adults with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

The association between reading anxiety and reading achievement: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Perfectionism is accelerating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analytic review of 35 years of college student data.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

High math anxiety is associated with lower math achievement across 90 countries: An individual participant data meta-analysis of representative student and adult samples.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Is thinking inherently unpleasant? A cautionary note on David, Vassena, and Bijleveld (2024).

Psychological bulletin·2026
See all related articles

This study explores automaticity, examining its core features like unintentionality and efficiency. Researchers conclude these automaticity features can be conceptually separated for distinct analysis, aiding cognitive psychology research.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Information Processing

Background:

  • Automaticity is theorized to encompass features like unintentionality, uncontrollability, goal independence, autonomy, stimulus-driven processing, unconsciousness, efficiency, and speed.
  • Contemporary research suggests investigating these features of automaticity individually.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conceptually analyze whether the distinct features of automaticity can be disentangled.
  • To determine if separate investigation of automaticity's features is conceptually justified.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of theoretical views on automaticity.
  • Examination of assumptions regarding feature overlap in automaticity.

Main Results:

  • The conceptual analysis indicates that features of automaticity are largely disentangleable.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Disagreement exists among researchers regarding the separability of automaticity features.
  • Assumptions about feature overlap are influenced by researchers' theoretical stances on automaticity and information processing models.

    • Conclusions:

    • The conceptual separation of automaticity's features is feasible and warrants separate investigation.
    • Differing perspectives on automaticity and information processing models shape views on feature overlap.