Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research, audit and quality improvement.

Roger Paxton1, Paula Whitty, Ali Zaatar

  • 1Newcastle, North Tyneside and Northumberland Mental Health NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. roger.paxton@nmht.nhs.uk

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance Incorporating Leadership in Health Services
|March 22, 2006
PubMed
Summary

This study clarifies the difference between research and audit, proposing regulations for audit and quality improvement to ensure ethical standards and efficient risk management, avoiding research-level over-regulation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Author Correction: Early human occupation of Australia's eastern seaboard.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Early human occupation of Australia's eastern seaboard.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Mobility and kinship in the world's first village societies.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Cardiovascular-related conditions and risk factors in primary care for deprived communities before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study in Northern England.

BMJ open·2022
Same author

Tailoring lipid management interventions to reduce inequalities in cardiovascular disease risk management in primary care for deprived communities in Northern England: a mixed-methods intervention development protocol.

BMJ open·2022
Same author

Variable kinship patterns in Neolithic Anatolia revealed by ancient genomes.

Current biology : CB·2021

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Regulation
  • Medical Ethics
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Distinguishing between research and audit is crucial for appropriate oversight.
  • Existing regulatory frameworks may not adequately address the nuances of audit and quality improvement.
  • Clear guidelines are needed to prevent over-regulation of non-research activities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To delineate the specific differences between research and audit activities.
  • To propose suitable regulatory frameworks for audit and related quality improvement initiatives.
  • To streamline ethical review processes for healthcare improvement projects.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature review was conducted.
  • Conceptual analysis was employed to differentiate between research, audit, and quality improvement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Existing regulatory guidelines were examined.

    • Main Results:

    • Research and audit share commonalities but diverge significantly in purpose and risk profiles.
    • Quality improvement represents a distinct category of healthcare activity.
    • Key differentiating factors include intent, risk assessment, and ethical considerations.

    Conclusions:

    • Proposed regulatory arrangements for audit and quality improvement facilitate ethical standards and risk management.
    • These arrangements aim to prevent unnecessary regulatory burden by distinguishing activities from research.
    • The findings offer valuable insights for advancing service improvement initiatives.