Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System (FFS) for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
Published on: June 12, 2016
E/M documentation pitfalls and audit advice
1The Dacey Group, 6973 Glover Lane, Stanley, NC 28164, USA. Billdacey@msn.com
Abstract:
This article examines some of the potential problems inherent in the 1995 and 1997 Federal Documentation Guidelines and goes on to give some broad advice regarding documentation of evaluation and management (E/M) services. One small area covered by the guidelines, the history of present illness (HPI), is given some attention as an example of the variability of the guidelines. The use of templates and electronic medical records (EMR) is also addressed in terms of how auditors and regulators would like to see these tools used. A section is devoted to the most important elements of medical record documentation from an auditing perspective. A do's and don'ts section covers common areas of chart deficiencies and focus.
More Related Videos
06:21Concept Development and Use of an Automated Food Intake and Eating Behavior Assessment Method
Published on: February 19, 2021
09:53Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery
Published on: March 13, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors