Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (Cf-PWV) to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Audit of hypertension in general practice
S C Chan1, T Chandramani, T Y Chen
1Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Royal College of Medicine Perak, Ipoh.
Insights
Hypertension management audits in general practice clinics revealed suboptimal performance in most indicators. While weight recording and blood pressure monitoring met targets, many areas require improvement for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- General Practice
- Public Health
Background:
- Hypertension management is a critical aspect of primary care.
- Auditing clinical practices is essential for quality improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To audit hypertension management in general practice (GP) clinics.
- To assess adherence to established indicators for hypertension care.
Main Methods:
- An audit was conducted in nine GP clinics in October 2004.
- Two structure, ten process, and two outcome indicators were evaluated.
- Data from 1260 patients were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Targets were met for weight recording (89%), BP monitoring (85.8%), follow-up intervals (87.9%), and mean diastolic BP (73.9%).
- Adequacy percentages for other indicators ranged from 22.1% to 68.7%.
- 59% of patients achieved target blood pressure (< or = 140/90 mmHg or < or = 130/80 mmHg with comorbidities).
Conclusions:
- Significant variations in performance were observed across clinics.
- Identified gaps necessitate targeted interventions to improve hypertension management.
- Remedial measures were recommended for implementation to enhance patient care.
Abstract:
An audit of hypertension management was done in October 2004 in nine general practice (GP) clinics. Two structure, ten process and two outcome indicators were assessed. Results showed that targets were achieved in only four indicators, i.e., weight recording (89%), BP monitoring (85.8%), follow-up interval not exceeding 6 months (87.9%) and mean diastolic BP (73.9%). The other indicators (hypertension registry, reminder mechanisms for defaulters, recording of smoking, height, fundoscopy, monitoring of lipid profile, blood sugar, ECG, renal function and achievement of target mean systolic pressure) showed adequacy percentages varying from 22.1 to 68.7. Out of the 1260 patients assessed, 743 (59%) achieved a mean BP < or = 140/90 (or < or = 130/80 mmHg with diabetes mellitus / renal insufficiency) in the last 3 recorded readings. There was a vast difference between individual clinics. Reasons for not achieving targets were discussed and remedial measures for implementation were recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension V: Nursing Management

