Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Use of an Influenza Antigen Microarray to Measure the Breadth of Serum Antibodies Across Virus Subtypes
Published on: July 26, 2019
Estimating the risk population in relation to influenza vaccination policy
Douglas M Fleming1, Alex J Elliot
1Birmingham Research Unit of the Royal College of General Practitioners, Lordswood House, 54 Lordswood Road, Harborne, Birmingham B17 9DB, UK. dfleming@rcgpbhamresunit.nhs.uk
Abstract:
There are many small differences in national influenza vaccination polices, some are age related and others morbidity related. This study examines a large English general practice database for 2003 to estimate the size of the England and Wales population at risk because of co-morbidity and to make recommendations on the choice of morbidity codes for use when estimating demand for vaccine and in auditing medical records to assess vaccination uptake. Morbidity codes relevant to the assessment of risk were defined and the database was analysed to estimate the annual period prevalence of the various diseases and groups of diseases. A set of morbidity codes is recommended which taken together include 3.2% of age group 0-14 years, 7.5% of 15-44 years and 16.6% of 45-64 years.
Related Concept Videos
Influenza
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Sample Proportion and Population Proportion
Estimating Population Standard Deviation
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Relative Risk

