Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Systematic Assessment of Mammalian Skull Specimens for Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology
Published on: August 22, 2022
Correcting for guessing increases validity in multiple-choice examinations in an oral and maxillofacial pathology
Thomas J Prihoda1, R Neal Pinckard, C Alex McMahan
1Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 78229-3900, USA.
Abstract:
A standard correction for random guessing on multiple-choice examinations was examined retrospectively in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course for second-year dental students. The correction was a weighting formula for points awarded for correct answers, incorrect answers, and unanswered questions such that the expected value of the increase in test score due to guessing was zero. We compared uncorrected and corrected scores on examinations using a multiple-choice format with scores on examinations composed of short-answer questions. The short-answer format eliminated or at least greatly reduced the potential for guessing the correct answer. Agreement of corrected multiple-choice scores with short-answer scores (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.78) was significantly (p=0.015) higher than agreement of uncorrected multiple-choice scores with short-answer scores (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.71). The higher agreement indicated increased validity for the corrected multiple-choice examination.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Reliability and Validity
Blind Procedures
Blinding
Hindsight Biases
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...