Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolysis: the definite management of st elevation myocardial infarction
Jose Martinez-Ojeda1, Jose Martinez-Toro
1Cadiology Fellow, University Hospital, University of Puerto Rico, School of Medicine, San Juan. josemartinez00@hotmail.com
Insights
ST elevation myocardial infarction management has evolved. Percutaneous coronary intervention, with advanced therapies, shows benefits over fibrinolysis in reducing heart attack severity and mortality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management has seen significant advancements.
- Fibrinolytic agents have improved clot specificity and efficacy.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with adjuvant therapies has emerged as a key treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of PCI versus fibrinolysis in managing STEMI.
- To evaluate the impact of PCI on infarct size, myocardial function, and mortality.
Main Methods:
- Review of studies comparing PCI and fibrinolysis for STEMI.
- Analysis of outcomes including infarct size, left ventricular function, and mortality rates.
Main Results:
- PCI, particularly with glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibitors and clopidogrel, challenges traditional fibrinolytic therapy.
- Studies demonstrate superior outcomes with PCI compared to fibrinolysis in STEMI management.
- PCI leads to decreased infarct size, improved myocardial function, and reduced mortality.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention is a highly effective treatment for ST elevation myocardial infarction.
- PCI offers significant advantages over fibrinolysis in improving patient outcomes and reducing mortality in STEMI.
- The combination of PCI and adjuvant therapies represents a paradigm shift in STEMI care.
Abstract:
The management of an ST elevation myocardial infarction has undergone significant changes in the past few years. Fibrinolytic agents have become more and more clot specific increasing their efficacy. However, percutaneous coronary intervention, along with its adjuvant therapy (glycoprotein IIB/IIIA receptor inhibitors and clopidrogel), have come to challenge fibrinolytic use. Many studies have demonstrated the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention as compared to fibrinolysis in the management of acute myocardial infarction by decreasing infarct size, myocardial function loss, and mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care