Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Introduction and Methods of Leveling

Introduction and Methods of Leveling

Leveling is a surveying procedure used to determine elevation differences between distant points. Elevation refers to the vertical distance above or below a reference datum, typically mean sea level (MSL). In the United States, elevations are often referenced to the mean sea level station at Father Point Rimouski along the St. Lawrence Seaway. To make the datum accessible, permanent markers are established throughout the region. These markers, called benchmarks, have known elevations. If the...

Differential Leveling

Differential Leveling

Differential leveling is a precise method in surveying used to determine the elevation difference between two points. Its primary goal is to establish accurate vertical measurements to create level surfaces or grade lines critical for designing and constructing infrastructures such as roads, bridges, and buildings.The procedure for differential leveling begins with setting up and leveling the instrument at a point where the benchmark can be seen. The level rod is held on the benchmark (BM), and...

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

Surveyors use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to measure the precise location and elevation of points on Earth. In a recent survey, GPS receivers were used to determine the coordinates and elevations of two park monuments. The process involved careful mission planning, data collection, and correction to ensure accuracy. The survey began with mission planning to identify optimal satellite visibility and minimize Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP). A geodetic control point served as...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) after radical cystectomy-current data].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2021

Same author

Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2019

Same author

Dimorphism throughout the European eel's life cycle: are ontogenetic changes in head shape related to dietary differences?

Journal of anatomy·2018

Same author

Validity of an ultra-wideband local positioning system to measure locomotion in indoor sports.

Journal of sports sciences·2017

Same author

The effect of short-term intermittent hypoxic exposure on heart rate variability in a sedentary population.

Physiology international·2016

Same author

Contribution of Vertical Strength and Power to Sprint Performance in Young Male Athletes.

International journal of sports medicine·2014

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children

Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children

Published on: August 22, 2012

Sea-level performance in runners using altitude tents: a field study.

E A Hinckson¹, W G Hopkins, J S Fleming T Edwards

¹Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. erica.hickson@aut.ac.nz

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

|April 8, 2006

Summary

Altitude tents showed little to no improvement in sea-level running performance for competitive athletes. Simulated altitude exposure did not significantly enhance lactate threshold or endurance in this study.

More Related Videos

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running

Published on: September 14, 2017

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Published on: July 17, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children

Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children

Published on: August 22, 2012

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running

Published on: September 14, 2017

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Published on: July 17, 2020

Area of Science:

Sports Science
Exercise Physiology
Altitude Training

Background:

Athletes often use simulated altitude exposure to enhance sea-level performance.
Altitude tents create hypoxic environments for intermittent exposure.
The efficacy of altitude tents on competitive running performance remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the effects of simulated altitude exposure using tents on sea-level running performance.
To assess changes in lactate threshold and time to exhaustion in runners exposed to hypoxia.
To explore relationships between performance changes and altitude exposure parameters.

Main Methods:

10 competitive runners slept in altitude tents (2500-3500m) for 24-30 days.
A control group of 10 runners maintained sea-level conditions.
Lactate threshold and treadmill time to exhaustion were measured before and after exposure.

Main Results:

A marginal, statistically unclear increase in lactate threshold speed was observed in the altitude group.
A 16% increase in time to exhaustion was noted, suggesting a potential but small performance benefit.
Performance changes showed no clear correlation with altitude exposure duration, ACE genotype, or hemoglobin concentration.

Conclusions:

Intermittent hypoxic exposure via altitude tents demonstrated minimal to no significant improvement in sea-level running performance.
The observed minor changes in endurance do not strongly support the use of altitude tents for competitive advantage.
Further research may be needed to clarify optimal protocols and individual responses to altitude tent training.