Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing (CCM) System
Published on: October 1, 2019
The WHO-ILAR COPCORD Bhigwan (India) model: foundation for a future COPCORD design and data repository
1Bharati Hospital & Medical College Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Hermes Elegance, 1988 Convent St., Camp, Pune 411 001, India. crdp@vsnl.net
Insights
The Community-Oriented Program for Control of Rheumatic Diseases (COPCORD) collects data on rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders (RMS). A revised, standardized COPCORD model is proposed to improve global data collection and control strategies.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- The Community-Oriented Program for Control of Rheumatic Diseases (COPCORD) was established by the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to address the global burden of rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders (RMS).
- Current COPCORD initiatives collect symptom data (pain, disability) during population surveys, with potential follow-up stages for education, risk factor identification, and control strategies.
- While several regions have implemented COPCORD, variations in methodology (sample size, data collection, classification) necessitate standardization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the need for a standardized COPCORD model to improve global data collection on rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders (RMS).
- To propose a revised COPCORD model based on the successful COPCORD Bhigwan (India) fast-track initiative.
- To advocate for collaboration between WHO-ILAR COPCORD and the Bone and Joint Decade (BJD) for a unified approach to controlling RMS.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing COPCORD methodologies and their variations across different countries and regions.
- Analysis of the COPCORD Bhigwan model as a successful fast-track approach for collecting significant data on rheumatic disorders.
- Proposal for a future COPCORD design incorporating a uniform, standardized core program with regional flexibility and a longitudinal observational phase.
Main Results:
- Significant data on rheumatic disorders has been generated through COPCORD initiatives, particularly the long-running COPCORD Bhigwan model.
- Identified inconsistencies in current COPCORD methodologies, including differences in sample size, data collection techniques, and classification systems.
- The need for a centralized COPCORD data repository and a unified approach to RMS control has been established.
Conclusions:
- The current global COPCORD model requires revision to ensure standardization and enhance data comparability.
- A proposed future COPCORD design emphasizes a standardized core program with regional adaptability, incorporating recent rheumatological advances and socioeconomic considerations.
- Collaboration between global initiatives like WHO-ILAR COPCORD and BJD is crucial for effectively controlling the burden of rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders worldwide.
Abstract:
Launched by the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) and the World Health Organization (WHO), the Community oriented program for control of rheumatic diseases (COPCORD) aims to fill the gaps in the knowledge on the global burden of rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders (RMS). During the population survey (Stage I), data on symptoms (pain and disability in focus), rather than diseases or syndromes, is collected. The survey may be followed by a planned stage to impart health education, identify risk factors, and devise preventive and control strategies. Several countries in the Asia Pacific and Pan-America have completed COPCORD survey. Africa has recently joined. Only COPCORD Bhigwan (India) has continued into the tenth year. COPCORD Bhigwan is a fast-track model that has provided significant data on rheumatic disorders. Using COPCORD Bhigwan model, the Bone and Joint Decade (BJD) India has launched several population surveys to measure the RMS burden. There is an urgent need for a COPCORD data repository. Several COPCORD have differed in their methods. Differences pertain to population sample size, techniques for data collection and recording, chronology of events and phases, and classification of symptoms/diseases/disorders. The COPCORD model in current global use needs to be revised. Based on the COPCORD Bhigwan model, a future design for COPCORD is proposed. COPCORD needs to have a uniform and standardized core program with a flexibility to cater to regional needs. It must imbibe some of the recent advances in rheumatology while retaining its socioeconomic appeal. It must have a planned follow-up/longitudinal observational phase. Above all, it must serve and benefit community. WHO-ILAR COPCORD and the global BJD initiative must join hands to serve a common cause of controlling rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders. COPCORD is also a reflection of the ILAR mission statement "think global, act local."
Related Concept Videos
Data Reporting and Recording
Data Collection I
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the patient.
Data Collection II
Purpose of Health Records II
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
